Kavanaugh accuser Swetnick faces credibility questions amid changing story, details from past

Fox ^ | 2018-10-02 21:00 | Adam Shaw

[McQ444]

Julie Swetnick, who has made uncorroborated and lurid sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, is facing credibility questions as she appears to partially walk back some of her more salacious claims about the embattled nominee and details about her past emerge.

[SkyDancer]

I hope she’s brought up on charges and sued for liable.

[TigerClaws]

How’d she get a security clearance?

She’s a loon.

[rightwingintelligentsia]

I think her sleazy lawyer should face credibility questions, too.

[GOPJ]

I hope she’s brought up on charges and sued for liable.

Agree.

[robel]

Everyone seems to be downplaying Avenatti’s role.

[j.havenfarm]

Liable for “libel” you say?

[Opinionated Blowhard]

“Faces credibility questions” suggests that she was credible at some point. She never was and no serious journalist should have written anything about her.

[Salvavida]

Blah, blah, blah, blah.... Did she violate US Code and make a false statement or allegation? Yes or No.

Let's get to an end game.

[wastoute]

When you see a Federal employee who has been transferred all over it usually ain’t because they are so good. It’s an easier way of getting them out of your shop than firing them.

[Autonomous User]

That is one psycho biotch.