Posted on 10/01/2018 1:48:18 PM PDT by detective
I could go with the personalities disorder.......I could see her abused as a little girl, using that teeny tiny voice
At the time...I knew nothing about her parents............
And I read her father's single statement....( As far as I know...)...and it was nice..and bland.
This woman is a hired hand...and nuts. And her family knows it.........
Should that have an s/
Nope....she said she told her husband BEFORE they got married. He said it was about the time of our marriage...which implies before or after.
And “Two doors down”
HUGE!
OMG!
She doesn't need to be hypnotized.
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that she is an expert on the subject of hypnosis.
Given her background, she knows how to play her audience (the Committee and the TV audience). She knows exactly how to elicit the desired result (which is sympathy for herself).
I want to know how she got published as a psychologist when I thought it has been established that she is not a licensed psychologist in California?
Remember Sally Field in Sybil
Is this real....can someone verify?
“I doubt she was under hypnosis.
I think my sense that she started from personality disorders and worked her way back to a story is becoming more plausible.
The emotions behind such a product would be entirely real, and would fit with her creation of knowledge she didnt possess.”
How do you explain the artificial little girl voice and little girl body language. She came off like a 10 year old girl talking to her mother or her father. She did not have the appearance of a 52 year old college professor testifying in an important proceeding before the U.S. Senate.
It was only the Kavanaugh part she had memorized. When asked simple questions about her fear of flying and the details of 1982 she was like a child, oblivious to the questions and the details.
I would like your opinions. I have my impressions but no proof.
Knowingly making a false accusation regarding a capital crime should carry the death penalty as well
The 5 year old baby girl voice she did during the hearing was enough to convince me she is a phony baloney liar..she read Mark Judge’s book, took some names out of that book and called them her attackers, that simple
Her story about when she first revealed the incident changed and probably will change again. But thanks for pinpointing when she told her husband.
These extra days of Kavanaugh fact-finding certainly seem to be backfiring on Dr. Ford and Senate Dems.
She is a ghost. I maintain that we cant say she is credible without a baseline of how she normally moves, sounds, acts. There is nothing to compare her storytelling to because there is no other video or audio of her outside of that testimony. Does she always sound like an scared 10 year old? We do not know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.