Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

As a side issue to the Kavanaugh circus, I have wondered why:

Why is it, that we are going back to high school and college to dig up dirt on someone?

Does drinking in college disqualify someone from being on the Supreme Court decades later? Why is any of this even being discussed?

Did anyone ask about the drinking and partying of Elena Kagan or Sotomayor? Or any previous Supreme Court nominee???

Is this going to be a new permanent low bar, that we can and should go back to high school in evaulating someone chosen for high positions? Is this a new norm?

Or do we just go back to high school for conservatives/Republicans????? What are the new liberal rules they appear to be imposing on the process?


7 posted on 10/01/2018 7:33:34 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

Or do we just go back to high school for conservatives/Republicans?????
= = =

We go back to Kindergarten, so Dems can argue at their own level (the smart ones anyway).


12 posted on 10/01/2018 7:36:18 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (You know that I am full of /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Why is it, that we are going back to high school and college to dig up dirt on someone?

Because once Kavanaugh started working, there are actual records, dates, and identifiable colleagues and clients -- that show absolutely nothing and would immediately disprove any false allegations.

24 posted on 10/01/2018 7:41:03 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The trap has been sprung. This is not about “the incident”: It’s about character assassination.

Ford was merely providing the theater under which he could be smeared.

She did a good job, too. Not perfect, by any means, but good enough that one contradicted statement - nothing to do with Ford whatsoever - will.have the desired result.

Let’s see if this guy swears out a statement first.


41 posted on 10/01/2018 7:49:32 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
What are the new liberal rules they appear to be imposing on the process?

According to Ms. Pelosi, you have to break the rule to find out if it is a rule.

49 posted on 10/01/2018 7:58:13 AM PDT by frog in a pot (Obama's "Remaking of America" continues apace in the absence of effective political opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Not to mention the insanity of the lawless Left acting like prudes about drinking and sexing...when convenient for them as they accuse.


55 posted on 10/01/2018 8:05:46 AM PDT by avenir ("But as for you, teach what accords with sound doctrine."--Paul to Titus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The answer is our system is stupider than it used to be.


75 posted on 10/01/2018 8:22:36 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson