[bitt]

No, this is dated Sept. 30.

Obviously you didn’t read it.

Better yet, I’ll give you squirrels links to the docs so you can bypass the ‘clickbait’

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“It appears that Rachel Mitchell finds Ford’s allegations totally suspect, potentially fraudulent”

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEI_mU0AIP5wG.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEJbPUUAAzU46.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEJ7VU4AAWRYF.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEKibUwAECED8.jpg

[LuvFreeRepublic]

There are five pages.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Phil_Mattingly/status/1046595107271659522

See last sentence.

[cynwoody]

No, this is dated Sept. 30.

Obviously you didn’t read it.

Better yet, I’ll give you squirrels links to the docs so you can bypass the ‘clickbait’

Here are your links resolved:

[guthunde47]

Thank you so much. We could not read the copy at the Twitter link. Lots of people read here at FR, post little or not at all, so thank you so much, bitt, (and everyone) for putting all the information out here.

[HollyB]

Thank you for posting this. Not sure why you’re getting grief. I’m relieved to read this report. Too many negatives from the dem’s with false reports. Good to see the truth coming forward and things getting wrapped up

[SaveFerris]

I’m scanning those quickly. Which one has the “potentially fraudulent” part if you recall? TIA

[Openurmind]

Thank you...