“Communist” — centralization of power. One and the same.
“Totalitarian” because they brook no dissent
[right]
“Fascist” — modern equivalent of book burning is partizan bans in ‘fairminded’ social media.
Here’s the difference with our forum:
Theoretically, a leftist could survive in this forum so long as he never slanders the right or antagonizes. Admin Moderator openly reserves the right to be partizan, but that is just leeway IMHO.
Never need to be partizan — leftists can’t behave themselves.
Well, it’s explicitly stated the ideology of the forum, being right of center and some libertarian (at least with respect to the size of gov’t). We’re not misrepresenting ourselves.
With respect to the media-entertainment industrial complex, the label they choose to apply to themselves, falsely and audaciously, is one of “fairness” or “tolerance” or “inclusive” (with other phrases such as “progressive”, which any student of history knows that was the label of the openly pro-Soviet party from the late 1940s. Even the earlier incarnation of the 1910s/20s was far-left).
Although many frequently label them “liberal”, that also is a falsehood. “Liberal” was hijacked by the left to make their totalitarian Socialist-to-Communist ideology seem palatable. Classic liberal is simply termed “Conservative” now. It really needs to be taken back.
I think it was Norman Thomas who stated that if the Socialist Party (really Communist) didn’t get the credit, he’d be fine and dandy with another party (Dem) co-opting the agenda and implementing it.