Personally, I think that a Ph.D should know what the hell "exculpatory" means, in particular as it was applied to her.
I found her to be childish, goofy, whiny and totally ignorant of how she was being manipulated.
Were it any one else, I'd feel sorry for her...as it is, well, she is just another tool of the corrupt dimocrat machine...a willing tool.
She clearly was peppering her testimony with fancy shmancy words and phrases like “episodic” or “indelible in my hippocampus” in an attempt to appear to be very intelligent. I wasn’t buying that for a second, and her whiny uptalk was a dead giveaway that she was a person of average intelligence who’s only hope for a PhD would be to get one from a much less demanding major, only slightly more difficult than gender studies.
If Fineswine admitted they found her in a homeless tent city, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised.