To: 50mm
Nope. Ford was under oath and under penalty of felony. If Katz was there as Ford’s lawyer, she had a duty to protect Ford. How would her duty to protect Ford change anything? Ford was obligated to testify truthfully. Katz could not advise her otherwise.
97 posted on
09/28/2018 11:03:30 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
To: Alberta's Child
Ford was obligated to testify truthfully. Yes, the other option is to decline to answer a question on advice of council. That's done all the time. Of course, you have to have a real council for that option.
98 posted on
09/28/2018 11:09:28 AM PDT by
50mm
To: Alberta's Child
And I should add, my previous post is the very reason conflicts of interest are unethical. When there is a conflict, who does the council protect?
99 posted on
09/28/2018 11:11:20 AM PDT by
50mm
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson