At the very least he’s honest. Too many on our side just don’t want to believe it, but they do.
If it is not a legal process, then why bother with oaths, Chuck?
Buttholes are life saving and perform an important function. Schumer, not so much.
It certainly is a legal process, but not a trial. Fact finding? Let’s do some of that, Chuck.
Wait...didn’t Schumer graduate from Harvard Law School?
Why yes...yes he did.
But hey, what’s the bedrock foundational legal principle America was founded on compared with the raw, naked pursuit of power?
Schumer proves conclusively that he is a democrat!
ML/NJ
“’I think it derailed me substantially for four or five years,’ she said. She struggled academically and socially, she said...”
Wikipedia claims she was born in 1967.
“She graduated in 1984 from Holton-Arms School in Bethesda, Maryland.
“She earned an undergraduate degree in psychology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1988.”
“Ford first started teaching at Stanford University in 1988.”
Her academic progress doesn’t seem to have gotten derailed.
“Ford described a ‘rape attempt’ in her late teens.”
“She said she believes it occurred in the summer of 1982, when she was 15, around the end of her sophomore year at the all-girls Holton-Arms School in Bethesda.”
The age 15 is mid-teens, not late teens.
I certainly hope all of these over the top statements are being compiled for future use . . .
.
There is no presumption of Intelligence, nor honesty for Schumer.
Chuck-U chucks the traditional American presumption of innocence down the drain.
What a schmuck!
Yuck Fou Schmuck Chumer!!!
Hey Schumer, McCain called and said that your room is ready.
I hate to say it, but the commie bastard is right.
Right on the Constitution and right on the law.
Now I’m gonna buy a bottle of good whiskey and drink til I puke. (Metaphorically. I don’t drink.)
Inasmuch as it is not a criminal trial, and no one has a right to any senator’s confirmation vote, that is true..OTOH Judge Kavanaugh does retain the right to vindicate his character in a defamation lawsuit - as he will need to if his nomination is not confirmed - and it should be a doozie. The MSM - personified as “The Associated Press and its Members” will be uncomfortable when named as defendant. That defendant not only has oozed actual malice from every pore, and committed industrial-scale libel, it has attacked a plaintiff who as a sitting judge and as a SCOTUS nominee should not be considered a “public man” under Times v. Sullivan. And in light of the behavior of the defendant, the very validity of Times v. Sullivan can be called into question.
Furthermore, that "industrial-scale libel” was committed by an entity which has already been found to be in violation of the Sherman AntiTrust Act of 1890. It was formed prior to 1890, and the suit in which it was found in violation of Sherman was, ironically, filed by another wire service and did not touch the issues of this case - but still.
In this case the violation of Sherman lies in the collusion of the members of the AP. Which, as Adam Smith could have predicted, was the inevitable result of a century-and-a-half of continual virtual meeting among them which is the AP “wire.” And the mission of the AP - the conservation of scarce, expensive telegraphy bandwidth in the dissemination of the news - has been obsoleted by modern communications technology. The AP is not too big to fail.
The transparent nature of the assassination of character involved in the systematic generation of charges which cannot possibly be proven true or false marks it as an exercise in cynicism - and anyone whose vote is affected by it attached a moral stigma to herself or himself.
Gee, I wonder if Keith Ellison will be given the Schumer Inquisition?