Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kavanaugh Accuser Christine Blasey Ford Indicates She May Not Testify After All
Political Insider ^ | 9-25-18 | Jim E

Posted on 09/25/2018 12:04:03 PM PDT by kingattax

Christine Blasey Ford is set to give the whole game away and then some.

This Thursday, the woman who accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault is set to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Ford alleges that Kavanaugh forcibly groped her at a party while both were in high school. So far, no eyewitnesses corroborate her account.

Everything up until this point has shown that Ford isn’t exactly a scrupulous truth-teller just out trying to do the right thing. She initially refused to testify, despite her attorney claiming she would before. (RELATED: Kavanaugh Accuser Christine Blasey Ford Wants FBI Investigation, Won’t Testify Before Congress.)

Then, once agreeing to testify, she claimed that she had a fear of flying, which could delay her getting to Washington, D.C., despite vacationing in the “mid-Atlantic” region just months prior. (RELATED: Christine Blasey Ford Indicates She Doesn’t Want to Fly to Testify.)

(Excerpt) Read more at thepoliticalinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christineford; kavanaugh; kavanaughallegation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-189 last
To: shelterguy

The probability of a civil suit is really zero. He is a public figure and the bar is very high to win as a plaintiff.


181 posted on 09/26/2018 7:50:04 AM PDT by Busywhiskers ("Once you have wrestled, everything else in life is easy" -Dan Gable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Perhaps my pessimistic take on modern politics and a bit of tinfoil hat tossed into the mix are coloring my assumptions here, but I believe she will appear. This has all the markings of a rolling advertising campaign not unlike when Apple unveils some new product. They tease with tiny tidbits, add mystery by having staff claim they don’t know anything and are in the dark, and set the scene at a specific date and time when the world can tune and become part owners of the unveiling dramatic ‘where were you when’ moment. She will enter the room - fashionably late so to have the contrived ‘will she - won’t she’ chatter by talking heads - and seek to earn a daytime Emmy for her role as a 21st century Erin Brockovich figure. I hope I’m wrong and everyone predicting she doesn’t show is correct but to me this seems like it has all been scripted by an advertising agency.


182 posted on 09/26/2018 8:54:06 AM PDT by Dan C (We are what we repeatedly do - excellence therefore is not an act but a habit. Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Busywhiskers

He would win a civil suit easily.


183 posted on 09/26/2018 9:02:16 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Dan C

None of your beliefs with regard to this debacle are unjustified. I hope she does appear because I believe the cross examination will publicly destroy the whole story.

Already the second lying whore has said she will not testify or even meet with an investigator (I believe). Why would that be?


184 posted on 09/26/2018 9:36:10 AM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Groping? When did Democrats become prudes? Seriously? This is so nuts. I kid you not, the next nominee they are going to drag up something they did in elementary school.


185 posted on 09/26/2018 11:20:54 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

At some point Murkowski has to be at least somewhat suspicious - doesn’t she?


186 posted on 09/26/2018 11:22:10 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

I don’t know if we should be pissed at Grassley or not? Maybe he had no choice. After all Murkowski indicated the takes this joke seriously.


187 posted on 09/26/2018 11:23:05 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

To a normal person. I am not sure Murkowski fits into that category unless he is just posturing.


188 posted on 09/26/2018 11:23:41 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

the next nominee by Pres Trump will likely be a woman. should
be interesting to see what the RATS do with that !


189 posted on 09/26/2018 12:02:24 PM PDT by kingattax (99% of liberals give the rest of the mental defectives a bad name !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-189 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson