The usual suspects, Murkowski, Collins, Flake and Corker...
A woman can be a victim, and a woman can accuse the wrong person, and a woman can out right lie....
A woman claiming she was victimized by a man 40 years ago, does not mean that she actually was victimized by that man. An accusation by itself is not evidence.
I have no problem letting this woman speak, assuming she even shows up.. but do I believe even if her allegations are true, that a 17 year old and a 15 year old drunk at a party, had an encounter that was less than stellar in its character, that the accused is a predator??
No, I do not.
Does that 1 encounter disqualify him from serving as a Supreme Court Justice?
No, I do not.
And that is assuming that EVERYTHING this woman has claimed is true. The greater problem is, there is absolutely no evidence, circumstantial or otherwise, that any of her allegations are true.
A claim of sexual assault, does not mean a sexual assault occurred. The notion that an accusation is enough is preposterous.
I empathize with this woman, but there is nothing there Ms Murkowski, and if you believe there is, that speaks to your character, not Mr. Kavanaughs.
I suspect Murkowski knows well there’s nothing there...that’s not the game she’s playing.
She wants Santa Claus Mitch to reach down deep in his bag of presents $$$$ and find her a gift. Murkowski knows about whoring around...she’s a political prostitute (like so many). She wants to be paid for her trouble (vote).