Skip to comments.
Former federal prosecutor joins Kavanaugh accuser's legal team
The Hill ^
| 09/22/2018
| Tal Axelrod
Posted on 09/22/2018 1:52:18 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-109 last
To: Thank You Rush
Speaking of Huber. Gorka was on Fox news this morning and his name came up and oh we haven’t heard anything from Huber and Gorka put his finger up and said be patient, be patient.
Shrug. Our side is good at patience and caving.
101
posted on
09/22/2018 5:34:21 PM PDT
by
Engedi
(The)
To: Beatthedrum
102
posted on
09/22/2018 5:59:58 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 from 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
To: hal ogen
Hey, no argument here. Beats anything I’ve ever seen.
103
posted on
09/22/2018 6:00:47 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 from 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
To: Thank You Rush
Yes, I agree with your thoughts there.
104
posted on
09/22/2018 6:01:28 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 from 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
To: BenLurkin
To protect her from 1,000 perjury/slander/libel charges and keep her out of jail .... and to help the Dems draw this out as long as possible.
105
posted on
09/23/2018 3:50:53 AM PDT
by
trebb
(So many "experts" with so little experience in what they preach....even here...)
To: SpeedyInTexas
I’m glad to see Michael getting back to work....rehab took a lot out of him.
106
posted on
09/23/2018 3:58:48 AM PDT
by
Mashood
To: Electric Graffiti; snarkytart
Rush called it a Jerry Springer Senate.
We can thank the 17th Amendment for the absence of decorum in a senate not worthy of the name.
107
posted on
09/23/2018 2:56:26 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
To: Jacquerie
We can thank the 17th Amendment for the absence of decorum in a senate not worthy of the name.What are the chances that the Constitution would have been ratified with the current setup?
To: windsorknot
If the Framers started off with a popularly elected senate, the chances for ratification in 1787-1788 would have been zero. The states were nervous enough as it was. Keeping the federal feature of the Articles of Confederation in the new Constitution was essential. State participation in the Senate was the keystone to limited government.
109
posted on
09/23/2018 5:08:04 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-109 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson