Replies

My first wife used to remember things that never happened, or were never said, or never even thought, and then used that to build a narrative to 3rd parties to gain sympathy for herself. In reality, she was later diagnosed delusional for remembering things that never happened or said, and paranoid for remembering things that nobody else ever thought. There is a strong correlation with her memories and the fact that she is now my EX-WIFE.

The classic example was when walking thru a shopping mall, if lets say 150 feet in front of me a young gal with a tight blouse on and came walking out of a shop. Even if I never saw her, immediately my EX would blurt out (loud enough for others to hear) "I see how you are looking at her, you want to F**k her don't you?" to which my response would be "What!!! Who? Huh?"

Before I learned better, I would try to calm her down, apologize for things I never did, etc. Later, I learned to avoid confrontation by learning to walk without looking up. It took me years to unlearn that habit.

The object lesson that I learned from all this was simple. NEVER give an inch. Never acknowledge that something "might" have happened. Never try to spare her feelings. Call her a liar right from the start. Put HER on the defensive, and make her attempt to back up her claim. Do it both in private and in public. Shame her if she even attempts to damage my reputation with her slander.

IMHO, the Republicans need to treat the Democrats as if they are delusional and paranoid, and take the same aggressive tactics I did, because THEY WORK.

Imagine the meltdown on the left if Grassley stood up and said, the charges are not credible. They are 35 years past when the event happened, and there is no memory of exactly when or where they might have occurred. There no witnesses to corroborate the accusation, and no evidence that they occurred. The accuser cannot even claim a good memory of what "may have" occurred, because she has changed her story multiple times. Furthermore, the act claimed was not an illegal act. She was NOT raped, even by her own admission. She was not imprisoned, because by her own admission she got out of the room.

What is known is this. The accuser is an activist for the Democrat Party. What is known is that the Senator that brought this forward had these accusations prior to the Interviews and Committee hearings, and chose not to share them until the vote was scheduled. This leaves us to conclude only one thing, and that is that this is not a serious, credible allegation, but rather and attempt at delaying a vote on an unsubstantiated, and unsubstantiable claim by a Senator that is desperate to get a nominee that she does not agree with thrown out, and she knows that without dirty tricks like this, the nominee will be confirmed. The claim will therefore not be investigated further, the vote shall be Thursday as previously scheduled.