Posted on 09/17/2018 3:49:31 PM PDT by familyop
Ford is a clinical psychology professor at Palo Alto University in California. A biostatistician, she “specializes in the design and analysis of clinical trials and other forms of intervention evaluation,” according to the university...After she retained the services of Debra Katz, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney, she took a polygraph test administered by a former FBI agent. According to the results shared with The Washington Post, the test concluded that Ford was being honest.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
A sociopath lacks the guilt response and will easily pass a polygraph test.
"If a woman came to me with a similar fact pattern, that is someone in the company above her propositioned her but only once and she suffered no tangible job detriment," Katz said, "I would probably tell her that I'm sorry, it's unfair, but you don't have a case."
Katz said that courts have generally held that a one-time proposition does not constitute harassment. "If it's one time, it has to be severe, almost a sexual assault, not just a touching of somebody's breast or buttocks or even forceful kissing," she said.
So to Ms. Ford's lawyer, Debra Katz, a bit of unwanted touching, if it happened just once, doesn't even rise to the level of sexual harassment. More exactly, what Bill Clinton did to Paula Jones was not big deal, and not even enough to lead to a claim of improper behavior in the workplace.
So even it what Ms. Ford says happened, did occur, how is what she described even worth talking about? It would not even rise to the level of being sexual harassment in an office, and it certainly would not be disqualifying behavior among high school students 30+ years ago - or at least that is what Debra Katz would say if it was a Democrat being nominated.
This is the Democrat version of the nuclear option: they get someone from your past who accuses you of sexual misconduct with minimal detail from decades ago- and media turns it into a crusade
How does Kavanaugh defend against this?
How would anyone?
7:14 PM - 17 Sep 2018
https://twitter.com/BuckSexton/status/1041827754528923650
Bump
Yes, and this should be used by the Republicans in defense of Judge Kavanaugh. It's so transparently political, and this degree of irresponsible and unethical behavior by the Democrats needs to be showcased and pinned onto their collective chests.
Administered by a former FBI AGENT....HMMM...Key phrase!
I guess when Deep State deletes your past, it gets deleted. Just ask the Las Vegas shooter. Oh wait...
Given this information how could this woman even remember any party much less a specific party Kavanaugh was at. With her track record of men, can she even remember any of them to any great degree even now? I would say she has a lot of problems.
I want to meet the husband and how does he feel about all this information coming out? Wonder if he knew about all about the previous bed partners his wife had?
Polygraph results are pure bullshit anyway.
There is a VERY GOOD REASON THEY ARE INADMISSIBLE IN COURT.
I know, I’ve been there.
Apparently that’s not what happened. The Blasey’s settled with the lender and the bank asked Judge Martha Kavanaugh to dismiss the case. She did. The Blaseys kept their house and there is no record that they ever appeared in person in front of Judge K. This is according to Montgomery county court records researched today by Steven Portnoy of CBS radio.
Can’t SOMEONE retrieve all of her Socila Media that she SCRUBBED???
And I hope someone on our side has the guts to say certain things. And I hope someone on our side has the guts to say certain things. Such as, why did Dianne Feinstein sit on this information all through the hearings? If cases of sexual assault and sexual harassment are such huge issues why did Dianne Feinstein sit on it?
And related to that, why did they wait until after the hearings but before the committee vote , in that perfect time period, to release something like this?
This is classic he said and she said. But the timing is so blatantly obvious that I think even liberals have to admit that the release of this was purely political.
BIDDLE???? Isn’t that the name of the Mayflowere Madam??
Uncontested motions don't usually get a hearing. Bank lawyer types up a motion to dismiss then faxes to defendant lawyer, defendant agrees and signs, then it gets faxed to the court and the judge signs it. Only get an appearance if motion is contested and then a hearing gets set. At least in my experience with being sued and suing others.
They went to DIFFERENT SCHOOLS!! Geese....you sound like a gullible girl,
Her husband saying: “she was scared he would one day be nominated to the Supreme Court.” that seems to be the only truth of the matter.
If you have ever dealt a pathological liar (I have), a polygraph is worthless ... they will pass every time.
Good to know. Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.