[Interesting Times]

The Weather Channel noted in a statement to The Hill that the reporter was standing on wet grass and was “undoubtedly exhausted.”

“It’s important to note that the two individuals in the background are walking on concrete, and Mike Seidel is trying to maintain his footing on wet grass, after reporting on-air until 1:00 a.m. ET this morning and is undoubtedly exhausted,” the network said.

It's a stupid and dishonest response, of course, but probably the best option they had. The attorneys vetoed the first draft, which read: "Okay, you got us. We're lying sacks of fraud and you can't believe anything we do or say."

Following that was a short-lived but intense discussion over whether the public might accept the argument that the two strolling dudes were actually in the hurricane's eye.

[traderrob6]

Remember this...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgm3_jzcNm4

[firebrand]

Hilarious.

[a fool in paradise]

Hey if a hurricane strength of one can be reported as a 6 because “Trump”, all journalist reports will be exaggerated.

[Oatka]

"Okay, you got us. We're lying sacks of fraud and you can't believe anything we do or say."

My jaw dropped when I heard a Weather Channel guys say "The worst storm in human history."

Remember this gem? Reporter in canoe