Posted on 09/12/2018 5:38:14 PM PDT by markomalley
A series of text messages released Wednesday reveal that former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok was in contact with reporters at the New York Times and Washington Post regarding stories they published about the FBI’s investigation into alleged collusion between Russia and President Trump’s campaign during the spring of 2017, according to a series of texts obtained by SaraACarter.com.
The text messages suggest that Strzok, along with his paramour, former FBI Attorney Lisa Page, had been in contact with reporters from both newspapers. Strzok specifically mentioned two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times writer Michael Schmidt his text message to Page.
Strzok wrote, “Also, apparently Times is angry with us about the WP (Washington Post) scoop and earlier discussion we had about the Schmidt piece that had so many inaccuracies. Too much to detail here, but I told Mike (redacted) and Andy they need to understand we were absolutely dealing in good faith with them,” Strzok texted to Page on April 14, 2017. “The FISA one, coupled with the Guardian piece from yesterday.” (The New York Times did not respond immediately for comment. The Washington Post also did not respond immediately for comment.)
According to several U.S. officials who spoke to this news outlet, “Mike” mentioned in Strzok’s text message is Mike Kortan, the former FBI assistant director for public affairs who retired in February. “Andy” was in reference to former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. McCabe was fired earlier this year after it was revealed in DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report that said he lied to investigators and leaked information to the media.
These series of text messages appear to contradict statements made by Strzok’s attorney, Aitan Goelman, after it was revealed earlier this week that Strzok and Page discussed a “media leak strategy” in some of their text messages. Goelman insisted, “the term ‘media leak strategy’ in Mr. Strzok’s text refers to a Department-wide initiative to detect and stop leaks to the media.”
Goelman’s statement came after President Trump tweeted about the newly revealed text messages and North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows sent a letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein asking him to investigate the text from Strzok regarding the “media leak strategy.”
In light of the recent Strzok and Page text messages, Meadows has also asked Rosenstein to provide the committee with the opportunity “to review text messages, emails, and written communication form FBI and DOJ officials Stu Evans, Mike Kortan, and Joe Pientka between June 2016 to June 2017,” first reported here.
Meadows stated in the letter, “to be clear, we are not suggesting wrongdoing on the part of Evans, Kortan, and Pientka- and, in fact, previously reviewed documents suggest that some of these individuals may share the committees’ same concerns.”
On April 11, 2017, The Washington Post broke a story titled “FBI Obtained FISA warrant to monitor former Trump advisor Carter Page,” which contained detailed information that the FBI had obtained a secret court order to monitor Page, a short-term Trump campaign volunteer, in October 2016. The story, written by Ellen Nakashima, Devlin Barrett and Adam Entous referred to unnamed U.S. law enforcement and other U.S. officials who told The Washington Post that the FBI and Department of Justice obtained the warrant on Page after “convincing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court judge that there was probable cause to believe Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power.”
However, in April 2017, former FBI Director James Comey had signed the third renewal on Page, according to reports. In June, Rosenstein would sign off on the fourth FISA warrant renewal application to allow the FBI to continue monitoring all of Page’s communications, which ended in September 2017, after the renewal expired.
“It may constitute a waiver of any reason for secrecy provisions that are part of a warrant application,” said criminal and civil rights attorney, David Schoen. “Under the rules of the FISA court, their disclosure to a third party should have been revealed to the FISA court. It’s a material fact that should be disclosed under the FISA court rules and besides all that it would certainly violate FBI rules. The question is why was he doing that? Why was he leaking it?”
Schoen believes there is no reason the FISAs should not to be declassified considering they were willing to leak the information to the Washington Post.
The Washington Post story also suggested that the FISA warrant on Page “is the clearest evidence so far that the FBI had reason to believe during the 2016 presidential campaign that a Trump associate was in touch with Russian agents.”
Page, who has denied any wrongdoing and has never been taken into custody for the claims made by the FBI, said his life was turned upside down when his name was leaked to the media. He said he has also received death threats and his reputation was tarnished after former British spy Christopher Steele leaked parts of his unverified anti-Trump dossier to the media.
“Like I’ve said all along this is a complete joke,” Page told SaraACarter.com. “It’s not about me, they are just trying to undercut the Trump administration’s accomplishments.”
Is this not criminal?
Ask Burr. He’s letting Warner run the show.
No more free delivery from amazon for them folk. They is not bezos prime. Toss em on the comPost pile.
I hope so. I was under the impression Congress just got these texts, but IG has had them.
The media isn’t pulling it all together into a story that people can grasp, like they did for, say, Watergate. Because of its complexity, it can hide in plain sight.
What is good faith about leaking sensitive intelligence information to The NY Times and Compost?
Probably because the majority of those likely to prosecute and adjudicate their cases consider them Heroes of the Revolution.
it wasn’t easy find this either.
because FakeNewsMSM is not reporting this story, it is difficult even for Varney to know what has already been established. Jim Jordan responds with a list of some of the cabal members:
VIDEO 2:43: 12 Sept: Gateway Pundit: Jim Hoft: Report: THIRTEEN Different Deep State FBI Agents Fed Information to ONE LIBERAL REPORTER (VIDEO)
Your Deep State at Work…
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) the current chairman of the House Freedom Caucus joined Stuart Varney on Wednesday to discuss the latest Strzok-Page text messages released by the DOJ...
Rep. Jim Jordan: Remember Stuart when Michael Horowitz, the Inspector General, did his investigation he talked about the fact that one reporter had 13 different individuals at the FBI who were feeding him information. So, there was certainly a leak strategy going on. The most troubling aspect of all of this is that, remember Devin Nunes memo about what they took to the FISA Court. They cited media reports to buttress the dossier which we know wasn’t valid, wasn’t corroborated, wasn’t credible. But they used media reports to buttress the dossier. They were leaking information to the media that they were then using to buttress the document that they were using to then get the warrant to spy on the Trump campaign...
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/report-thirteen-different-deep-state-fbi-agents-fed-information-to-one-liberal-reporter-video/
Geesh unbelievable. And not a PEEP from any of the so called “news” channels.
Sounds less and less like “leaking” and more and more like “espionage” with every revelation.
why are they walking around free instead of in prison....
If they were in prison then how could they meet their schedules of TV appearances and book signings for their hard hitting anti-Trump bestsellers like Comey,Stormy,Woodward and the rest?
Only Trump fans go to prison.
We on the right are much too gentle and kind to fight back.
tons of stuff on media in this piece:
12 Sept: Daily Caller: Lee Smith: OPINION: How Anti-Trump Leakers Moved From Offense To Defense
As Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes reported in their book, “Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign”:
“Within 24 hours of her concession speech, [campaign chairman John Podesta and manager Robby Mook] assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. … Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”...
This investigative exposé originally appeared in RealClearInvestigations.com, which is supported by the RealClearFoundation.
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/12/anti-trump-leakers-offense-defense/
Great stuff. Thanks for posting it.
...Why aren’t they prosecuted and set to spend the rest of their miserable lives in prison...
Because Democrats and other liberals live under another legal system. Its like an alternate universe.
Everybody thought that these texts had been destroyed. Strzok likely lied under oath to congress. His lawyer clearly lied with his “leak strategy” explanation just a few days ago. The noose is tightening. This is beginning to look like a complex sting operation.
The highest rated news channel is Fox News and they cover this everyday.
Why correct the auto-correct that posted "incitement"?
I know a lot of people dislike auto-correct, but it's amazingly prescient in actually suggesting/replacing words that many times bring home a point better than the original.
In this case, incitement seems so much more apropos that indictment. LOL
No, the real question is, what is the penalty, under law, for committing such a violation?
The second question is, why hasn't he been charged, and why isn't he being prosecuted, as proscribed by said law.
>> Why the delay in incitement?
The corrupt Democrat Thug Party.
Admittedly, many may take it as the gospel truth, but again, that's like being worried that enemy soldiers might actually fight. So what? That's what they're supposed to do.
And our job is to defeat them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.