Posted on 09/05/2018 12:33:06 PM PDT by Kaslin
Now it makes sense why Linda “Cockroach” Sarsour was such a fly in the ointment.
“Serious legal scholars on the left, including Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, support him”
Uh, oh.
If a candidate doesnt drive the leftards into a slavering, convulsing, howling, puking, chewing-their-own-lips-off, full-blown Exorcist seizure, that candidate is not morally fit for office.
The Democrats are an embarrassment. I hope their children and grandchildren were watching how rude and uncivil they are.
Particularly in this last term, I came to believe that if Kagan cannot be completely turned, she can at least become much more moderate. She’s not so nearly far gone as Sotomayor or Ginsburg. Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are the perfect influences for Kagan on the Court, and I think you will see some surprisingly good opinions from her. Not all the time, but more than you would expect.
True, LOL.
If, somehow, RBG retires the left is gonna go even more nuts on the next one, too.
One has to wonder why the LIEberal disruptors, both Senators and others, believe that their boorish, “rude and uncivil” behavior is going to cause Americans to support their cause.
To these boorish, “rude and uncivil” LIEberals I say “Have at it! You are gaining support for OUR cause, not your cause!”
Those of us “deplorables” who supported and voted for Donald J. Trump are going to rise up on November 6, 2018 and retire a bunch more of you. You are about to become a footnote on page 265 of the “History of the USA in the 21st Century!”
WOW
Yep the MSM will never print that.
I understand what you are saying, and I am NOT trying to nit-pick, but...
A more accurate representation would be the percentage of women who graduate and successfully pass the BAR versus the percentage of men who do the same.
For example, 100 people graduate from law school and pass the BAR, of that 100, 65 are men, and 35 are women. In this scenario, women being 52% of your clerks would be an over-representation of women in the workplace.
Using the general percentage of women in the population is used a lot because it points to an injustice that many times does not exist. The standard talking point is that women are under represented in the STEM fields, but no one mentions that women do not enroll in STEM fields in the same rates as men do.
Said another way, while women may be under represented as a percentage of total population in the STEM fields, they are hired at a much higher percentage rate than their equally qualified male counterparts.
“...If a candidate doesnt drive the leftards into a slavering, convulsing, howling, puking, chewing-their-own-lips-off, full-blown Exorcist seizure, that candidate is not morally fit for office.”
Completely agree with the sentiment, and very much appreciate the verbiage! Truly gifted.
Bravo!!
KYPD
I disagree. Unless one thinks that men are simply better law clerks than women, one would expect there to be an even distribution that is close to the general population (or at least the population of legal personnel out there to choose from)
I would be concerned if he had a statistically significantly greater percentage of women, because that would indicate something other than simple competence was involved (He prefers women around him in the workplace for whatever reason, or he is hewing to a PC line for PR by hiring more women)
Just my two cents...
Coons should not even be there.
Dumbass trying to over-reach executive authority. Libtard from fascist hell.
That sounds a little wacis'.
When I seethese pieces of libtards praising him, it doesn’t make me feel any better about him.
The ratios in STEM categories are not because of institutionalized sexism.
It is self inflicted and voluntary. Namely women do not prefer to go into these fields as a demographic because they don’t like the work and effort to study what they consider to be difficult and boring things that have actual absolute, objective answers.
This is why.
Correct.
Aw, come on. Even leftards have to pay homage to unquestionably great judges, such as Brandeis, Holmes and Scalia. Kavanaugh might be fit for that august company, so those that know his decisions and are well established in the legal business, such as Justice Kagan, back the hell down and call a spade a spade (oops. racist. bad.).
Unless you can provide the info that ‘Sergio” hinted at, my argument is no different from yours. Statistical the same as the general population.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.