Posted on 08/28/2018 8:17:55 AM PDT by Kaslin
John McCain's exit from life and politics has commentators of all sorts falling into interpretive contortions.
"I opposed him, but..."
"I liked him in spite of..."
It was McCain's gift, springing from personality and life experiences, to antagonize and enrapture, to confound and excite, often at the very same moment. He was neither wholly one thing nor entirely another: neither hardline "conservative" nor "establishment" dupe; neither the selfless public servant incarnate nor the loosey-goosey adherent to some individualistic code.
I admired and twice voted for the man. Even in not-infrequent moments of disagreement, I took care to cut him some slack. I will tell you why. He was, according to my estimate, two distinct things in short supply today: a serious man and a hard-core patriot. If you can't salute those particular attributes, which ones can you salute?
His moral seriousness, embodying a commitment to generosity, decency and right actions, hid behind a mask at times. Despite his physical sufferings as a prisoner of the communist North Vietnamese, McCain was by most accounts a hoot to be around. He didn't mind a little irreverence -- a trait I see as stemming, plausibly, from his deep personal acquaintance with authority, particularly of the military sort. The media for a time ate up all this irreverence with a spoon.
No wonder: There was no Savior of the Nation grandiosity about Sen. John McCain. A man who could laugh at himself -- who could, for instance, kid about the effect of Krispy Kreme doughnuts on his physical profile -- was entitled to some measure of celebrity. He was a different kind of Republican, we were notified, open-minded, friendly, even slightly progressive.
With such press notices he had to be at least a little pleased. Yet not so pleased as to lose his understanding of public service as contractual in nature. The voters had sent him to Washington, D.C. They deserved the best service of which he was capable. That implied the duty of serious attention to public concerns.
Of all public concerns, that which chiefly engaged McCain's attention was national security, underwritten by military preparedness. This was to be expected of a third-generation Navy man. His father and grandfather, as all the obituaries have noticed, were four-star admirals. A sense of duty, and of gratitude, comes embedded in such a legacy -- a sense of appreciation for the sacrifices of others, a realization of the necessity for sacrifices still to come.
Every reader knows of McCain's barbaric treatment by his Vietnamese captors -- a point of which Donald Trump disagreeably made light during the 2016 campaign, claiming personally to like "people who didn't get captured." McCain sustained tortures barely describable -- in part, I guess, for the crime of displeasing an entrepreneur safe at home, attending to business. Mostly, however, it was for the sake of loving America too much to shame her with submission to tyranny and cruelty.
Love of country, in our time, may be the least-fashionable public virtue on public display, and commitment to freedom a relic of an exasperating history dominated by white male patriarchs, slayers of Indians, enslavers of blacks. The John McCain who fell into Vietnamese hands while defending freedom knew better and, throughout his latter career, never gave over his faith in America as the primary carrier of the freedom virus. He offended many in public life by his advocacy of strong, interventionist policies abroad, meant, basically, to reinforce freedom in America itself. He constantly advocated such military spending as seemed requisite to the entirely legitimate (it would seem to me) goal of military predominance in a world teeming with screwballs and America-haters.
There seems ample room to debate the wisdom of this American intervention or that one without discarding the overriding wisdom that projection of national strength warns the screwballs and America-haters to keep their distance. Because if they don't, then they'll run, head-long, into the heirs of John McCain; lovers of freedom and imitators of his worthy example, telling foreign enemies, in McCain-like tones of defiance, just where they can get off.
I voted for McCain in 2008 as well. What choice did you have?! I firmly believe that if he won, Obama would’ve taken 2012 and 2016 and Trump wouldn’t have had a chance. Too much white guilt.
Patriot to which country?
I did not see any “Patriotism” in John McCain’s Neocon war mongering. Got the US involved in 2 absolutely useless conflicts in Libya and Syria out of nothing more then his pompous narcissistic ego.
You excuse Ace of arming our country’s enemies because of his acquaintances?
Did you read his 2008 “concession” speech about which our domestic enemies are so enthralled?
Was McCain always like this? I think once the media gave him the title ‘Maverick’ he let it go to his head, and it poisoned his thinking into wanting to be the Party contrarian.
I don’t think there has been this much media coverage of the death of a political figure since RFK was assassinated.
The Vietnamese communists having a statue of this jackass in Hanoi is enough for me to have little or no use for him alive or dead.
This was the precedent for the Comey "no intent" Hillary defense exoneration
What patriot died ?
Patriot?
Maybe to the Viet Cong.
Puke! Should be death of a rat. McCain was all for helping various terrorists in the name of Neocon war-mongering. Being dead has not imbued him with any virtues.
A statement that dissagrees entirely with the Book of Esther, and the Feast of Purim.
He was a bad man.
A very, very bad man.
I disagree with your assertion that an average man would work hard to arm ISIS, but if you want to CONTINUE to make that statement then we can debate it until you finally feel embarrassed enough to give up the attempt.
The RNC should broadcast his “Build the dang wall” TV ads which he ran in his last election continuously until November.
I’m not really into long goodbyes..anyone have any estimates when we all collectively,once in for all, bid the 2000 year old man good bye?
Whew. After reading the Headline I thought something happened to POTUS Trump.
McCain winning in '08, would have resulted in much the same damage done, only the GOPe would have said, 'Phew, think of how bad it would be if the OTHER guy had gotten in....'. And we'd all keep sending campaign contributions into a rigged game, because a lousy choice is better than none at all.
And, Obama - or more likely, Hillary - wins in '12, or certainly '16, and the country still winds up in the same deep, deep hole, only now with no way to climb out.
But here we are, things are not great, yet, but they're certainly looking up. I, for one, am glad that WBill Jr. finally gets to see what the country looks like when things are going well - I'm sure that's a lesson that won't be lost on his generation.
All things happen for a reason. Only, sometimes, it's hard to understand why at the moment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.