Btw, these people say that "climate deniers" don't have to be ridiculed, immediately after ridiculing them by comparing them to flat earthers. In addition to being totalitarians, you can count on Leftists to be hypocrites.
If it wasn’t for “climate change” Chicago would still be under a mile of ice.
Climate change is called weather and has been happening since the beginning of time.
JoMa
Where’s the Goebbels’ pic?
You know damn right the climate is changing.....just like it has for billions of years.
Climate changes....thats real.
As to how to control it..,thats fake
They need to go smoke another joint. By the time they’re done smoking, the “climate” will change......again. These people are STUPID.
Is that anything like “Slaughter the deniers!”?. I suppose if they want to stop by, that’ll be fine.
When they can explain why climate change only happens during the summer, but not during the winter (news cycle), they might make some headway.
I am so glad these clowns articulated the open-mindeness of the scientific investigation process so well. (Yes, that is extreme sarcasm).
Yes, climate change is real and has been happening since the Creation.
However, that mankind can have any more than a seventh order effect on it is fantasy.
Yeah...climate has changed all the time throughout natural history. Just like the Ice Age disappeared. And no amount of taxes levied could have stopped it. That is a scam and a flim flam.
Calling me a denier because i don’t except your pseudo science really hurts my feelings.
Note the "fringe voices pejorative designed to discredit and ridicule. Next, note the hypocrisy of acknowledging "free speech" because it's still politically correct to feign that, but in the very same sentence the author states, "no one is obliged to provide them with a platform".
So yeah, free speech, but Google, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, et.al., are justified in censoring an opposing view.
In other words, free speech, but only if the left approves, otherwise one is not entitled to free speech.
Obama said it was settled science ,LOL
It is because the “opposition” is near nonexistent and what they do NOT DO is differentiate between natural climate change and their sham, MAN-MADE climate change. As per the RAT play book, their shams are always about something that is always contentious and not clearly demonstrable.
Assertions are not science. Blind faith is not science.
My only problem with all of this is that either its a belief system, or it is science.
If it’s science, then pose a working theory and then build experiments to test.
If it’s a belief system, then we’re done here. It’s a Gaia cult.
Back to science, let’s start with how a CO2 molecule can rise to the top of the atmosphere, though it is heavier than other molecules in the air column. Given the amount of plant life in the ocean, it would support that CO2 sinks, else the oceans would be deserts.
If they can tackle this, and construct experiments to support their assertions, then you have a debate, and more.
I know that CFCs were banned due to simple lab experiments that proved undeniably that it was eroding the ozone layer. It wasn’t even an argument. They were legal, then they weren’t.
Global warming could go the same way. Build your experiments and prove your assertions, the world will follow.
That was easy.
Of course climate change is real! Does anyone claim our climate is the very same today as it was when dinosaurs roamed the planet? Of course not
What we oppose is the people that want to tax us or somehow charge us for it. The climate has always been changing and always will change. I am not going to pay the Government for it!
> We must not offer credibility to those who deny it <
There is no such thing as “settled science”. Every scientist can give you a hundred examples of “settled science” that turned out to be wrong. Aristotle’s very flawed theory of gravity is but one example.
Continuous, vigorous debate is what moves science forward. Every scientist knows that. Yet most of them are silent when there are calls to shut down climate debate.
It’s disgraceful.