Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. judge rejects Trump directives easing ability to fire federal workers
Reuters ^ | 25 Aug 2018

Posted on 08/25/2018 11:04:50 AM PDT by mandaladon

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge on Saturday rejected key elements of President Donald Trump’s May executive orders that would make it easier to fire federal employees and reduce their ability to bargain collectively.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, said in a court order that Trump’s orders, which also would reduce the amount of time low-performing employees had to improve their performance before being fired, “undermine federal employees’ right to bargain collectively.”

Trump signed three executive orders in May that administration officials said would give government agencies greater ability to remove employees with “poor” performance, obtain “better deals” in union contracts and require federal employees with union responsibilities to spend less time on union work.

The directives drew immediate criticism from the American Federation of Government Employees, which said the moves would hurt veterans, law enforcement officers and others.

Jackson ruled that while the president has the authority to issue executive orders relating to federal labor relations, the orders cannot “eviscerate the right to bargain collectively” as envisioned in a long-standing federal statute.

“The President must be deemed to have exceeded his authority in issuing (the orders),” Jackson ruled.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2018election; 2020election; acherrytreetoofar; affirmactionjackson; afge; blackrobedclown; clownbammyjudge; districtofcolumbia; dncactionjackson; dncjudicialactivist; election2018; election2020; federalemployees; federalworkers; fedjudgepresident; jailforjudges; juckthefudge; ketanji; ketanjibrownjackson; lawlessliberals; obamanation; thebabyharpsealcure; thelawisinmymouth; trump; unfitforthebench; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: mandaladon

The pigment-protected progressive-leftist black female has spoken! None dare question the proclamations of our leftist judicial overlords!


61 posted on 08/25/2018 1:06:26 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

An obvious failure as well that couldn’t keep employment outside of the government. Four attempts at private practice, with the longest being 3 years.


62 posted on 08/25/2018 1:25:51 PM PDT by thescourged1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

What a shocker!


63 posted on 08/25/2018 1:28:02 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
Ketanji Brown Jackson

lemme guess

64 posted on 08/25/2018 1:36:53 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Ketanji? What is a ketanji?


65 posted on 08/25/2018 2:05:14 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

and this is exactly why federal employee unions are a conflict of interest


66 posted on 08/25/2018 2:06:29 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Oh, for God’s sake! My brother works in the VA, and one of their biggest problems is inability to get rid of dead-weight employees. That obviously has a big impact on the quality of care that can be given, not to mention making good employees’ quality of workplace lousy. (Dedicated employees are severely overworked trying to actually make “sufficient for the needs” efforts.)

Trump should absolutely excoriate* this judge for causing poorer, probably life-threatening in some cases, care, to be given.

*The first meaning, not the second!


67 posted on 08/25/2018 2:16:02 PM PDT by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
...the orders cannot “eviscerate the right to bargain collectively” as envisioned in a long-standing federal statute.

What statute?

68 posted on 08/25/2018 2:17:08 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Yes, these judges are horrible.

But in this case it could have been worse—she’s only 47 now, but Obama was vetting her as a possible USSC Justice:

“On February 26, 2016, the National Law Journal reported that Obama administration officials were vetting Jackson as a potential nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Barack Obama.[16] In March 2016, the Washington Post[17] and the Associated Press[18] confirmed that information, and Reuters reported that Jackson was one of five candidates interviewed as a potential nominee for the Supreme Court vacancy.[19]”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketanji_Brown_Jackson


69 posted on 08/25/2018 2:19:06 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bell Bouy II

She was appointed by the Seditious Halfrican Clown.


70 posted on 08/25/2018 2:27:11 PM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

It’s the letter in Swahili after Jumanji


71 posted on 08/25/2018 2:28:22 PM PDT by Phil DiBasquette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Phil DiBasquette

Good one.....


72 posted on 08/25/2018 2:30:33 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Reuters reported that Jackson was one of five candidates interviewed [by the Bammy The Clown administration] as a potential nominee for the Supreme Court vacancy [later by a REAL judge, not a Democrat political hack like Affirmative Action Jackson]

This is a revenge ruling against President Trump by this seditious Democrat swine-judge.

73 posted on 08/25/2018 2:34:12 PM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

...........for the sole purpose of disrupting the legal process


74 posted on 08/25/2018 2:34:40 PM PDT by Bell Bouy II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Bell Bouy II
He's already forced the News Misleadia to break themselves.

Now he's causing the black-robed Lefty clowns on the Federal courts to break themselves with their openly partisan Democrat rulings.

75 posted on 08/25/2018 2:38:02 PM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

“Ketanji”?
Am I a racist if I don’t bother to look?

Yes! My pet amoeba is named Ketanji.


76 posted on 08/25/2018 2:40:30 PM PDT by ProudVet97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yet another example of the failure of the racist, so-called affirmative-action”. The President needs to ignore this proto-fascista’s rulings. Did someone elect this nitwit President? Did i miss something? Maybe I slept through that election day...


77 posted on 08/25/2018 2:40:46 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

“undermine federal employees’ right to bargain collectively”

Which exists ONLY because of another EO issued by John Kennedy and which is NOT a RIGHT


78 posted on 08/25/2018 3:03:29 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

So any one of 600+ judges have a veto on Executive Branch Orders.

Congress could remedy this in a moment, but since all rats and half of the GOP oppose good and support evil, there isn’t a chance.


79 posted on 08/25/2018 3:17:10 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon; daler; Carl Vehse
<>Once again a judge overstepping their authority and making legislation from the bench...<>

What if lower court judges had to explain themselves?

On Congressional Oversight of Lower Federal Courts.

80 posted on 08/25/2018 3:22:27 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson