Posted on 08/19/2018 11:09:17 PM PDT by Innovative
The White House counsel has figured out how to appear transparent without giving Mueller the information he needs.
Has Don McGahn turned on Donald Trump? On Saturday, the New York Times published a lengthy story suggesting as much, hinting that the White House counsel may have reached the limits of his loyalty to the president. Reporters Maggie Haberman and Michael Schmidt detail McGahn’s assistance to Mueller’s Russia probe, including 30 hours of voluntary interviews with investigators. Trump, they write, allowed McGahn to speak to Mueller’s team, though the president may not have grasped the extent of his cooperation.
(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...
We called that out as fake news as soon as it hit FR. No sourcing other than “persons familiar with the investigation”.
Note the assumption that Trump has something to hide.
The writer is just as loony as Haberman and Schmidt. He criticizes their premises and then give his on weird ones, always assuming in “harsh” terms that Trump did something wrong.
You can’t have it both ways and to quote the sleazy lawyer Bob Bauer is like quoting Jeffrey Dahmer on proper eating etiquette.
If your premises are wrong in the beginning, they aren’t going to be correct later on.
This is a sign of mental illness, perhaps Trump Derangement Syndrome or just mental diseases suffered by NYT writers and Slate writers.
>> The writer is just as loony as ...
Well... Slate pretty much sucks ass.
God, I hate the media.
Maggie Haberman is all over the Wikileaks emails and gets identified by Q as a sympathetic Hillary Clinton relaible operator in the press.
reliable operator
The New York Times yesterday published a story saying anonymous sources declared that Melania’s furniture for the private quarters were overruled by brutal Donald Trump and now she’s stuck with horrible gold Louis XIV chairs that he favors. It wasn’t until the 16th paragraph that a named source denied this.
The Times lies for a living.
LOL! You don’t need Q to tell you that. Just read Haberman’s stories.
And that he is stupid. Note this gem from the article:
"Trump, they write, allowed McGahn to speak to Mueller’s team, though the president may not have grasped the extent of his cooperation."
...always assuming in “harsh” terms that Trump did something wrong.
But Trump is not part of the deep state so he would probably be toast. Except that is not happening.
See how Mueller went running to the NY Times to try and damage Trump.
Leaky prick.
Insert George Papadopolous for McGain and you have another nothing burger.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.