Posted on 08/19/2018 11:51:45 AM PDT by Magnatron
NBC security analyst and former CIA director John Brennan is doubling down on a threat to sue President Trump after the outspoken former Obama official was stripped of his security clearance.
Brennan appeared Friday night on MSNBC and told Rachel Maddow he is exploring litigation against the president. This follows Reps. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) saying Trump stripping Brennan of his security clearance is illegal.
As you can imagine, a number of lawyers reached out to say that there is a very strong case here, not so much to reclaim mine but to prevent this from happening in the future," Brennan said. "So, I am thinking about what it is that I might want to do. At this time, Im trying to make sure that the principle is what is going to be defended and supported and this is something that should not be repeated."
(Excerpt) Read more at news.grabien.com ...
This battle is taking facts in the public domain, and making a legal argument that the courts have power of who is entitled to have a security clearance, and who makes that decision.
The notion of taking this to court is absurd as a legal matter. It's nothing more than using legal process for harassment, which the left does with vigor, and the courts like it because it brings them work, revenue; and speaks to their sense of being the keepers of righteous power and judgment..
Libtards ate full batcrapnuts now! Just wait for The Wall.
I’m thinking that I’ve read somewhere that you can’t sue a sitting president. Otherwise, he’d be inundated with lawsuits
Is the corruption in the DOJ etc. so deep that Trump would have to appoint someone entirely outside the deep state to get anything done? And if he did, would senate RINOs approve the nomination?
Thanks Magnatron. Yes, he really said that. And Schiff-for-brains and the racist dunce Cummings suggested that cancellation of clearances is illegal, showing they have no idea what is and isn't law.
Good luck, you treasonous SOB.
Discovery in a case that aims to use court power to control Trump's power to grant and remove security clearance can be decided without entering evidence that Brennan was engaged in illegal activities. This is purely a question of court power over an executive function.
Looking in the other direction, Brennan can't use discovery as an excuse to seek motive for the withdrawal or cancellation of security clearance.
Your questions about the politics of all this, and the use of the system to thwart justice (RR using secrecy to protect illegal or unethical conduct by the DOJ/FBI) are well taken. There are ways to get this done. Trump has good people in place to get this done.
Most people want to see things get done the same way Obama and other Democrats do, by breaking rules of sound principle and knocking noggins.
Thanks for the comments!
DJT is POTUS I think he has more power than you do...you are a NOTHING and are not employed by the Federal Government any longer...and more than likely you never will be again...
Who this idiot thinks he is criminal...and as for Cummings and the Adam dude both of them are brain dead. THEY ARE PRIME EXAMPLES OF WHY WE NEED TERM LIMITS...
this Brennen is really pi$$ing me off...and DJT needs to send the democrats a message...I AM PRESIDENT, you losers are not...deal with it and now I'll really kick a$$, so get ready...
Sends chills down the spine thinking what this garbage would have gotten away with had Hillary succeeded in stealing the election.
I do love how FORMER officials think that they’ve got a lifetime free pass into whatever intelligence they choose...
Though honestly, I’m sure this hits hard at the pocketbook in the way of consulting contracts that would be eliminated when they no longer have security clearances. I remember quite a few retirees who made their living off of such consulting long after they left government employment or military service.
But I’m not sure what they imagine their case would be; it is utterly at the sole discretion of the executive if they retain their security clearances. Perhaps the lawyers just want an opportunity to stand before SCOTUS and get shut down.
Coming from a POS who admitted voting for Gus Hall for Pres back in the 70’s and 80”s. Here’s a fun fact,when he ran for pres in 1980 and 84 yrs Hall none other than cop killer Angela Davis was his running mate.
Brennan is 5 5.
No I meant LEGALLY or he goes to prison for perjury. Brennan could soon be a CRIMINAL!!
He is a moslem loving COMMUNISTS!! In a revolution, he would be hung on TV!! ( no hood).
They are losing and they are wild in desperation. It is their end. Trump will win in 2020 and his hand picked successor will win in 24!!
A sound and a fury signifying nothing.
“Suing the President for doing his job should be thrown out as frivolous, before it ever gets to a courtroom.”
I think you hit the nail on the head and are totally correct.
That is what should happen, but with some paid-off Dem puppet judges, you never know.
JMH,s>O</s> Fact, this man is possessed by allahs minions and he desires blood just as the cult desires blood.
Of course several lawyers have come forward and offered their services.
Its all about $$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.