Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OrangeHoof

My apologies if anyone out there is hammering this point but I am not seeing it communicated. This is not a first amendment nor free speech issue since speech is in no way restricted by this decision.


2 posted on 08/16/2018 2:04:16 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (CNN - the most busted name in news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OrangeHoof

That genius, Bret Baier, was saying it last night. How do you get there with this shoddy and illogical claim??? I guess he got the memo from the DNC.


12 posted on 08/16/2018 3:51:35 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: OrangeHoof
Most folks lose access but retain their clearances until they die a natural death (the clearances: 5 years for TS and 10 years for secret - counted down from when investigation was started for the clearance).

Removing the actual clearance is a statement of lack of trust/credibility/reliability - taking actions that would prevent one from getting the clearance in the first place...all these folks qualify as being ineligible to maintain a clearance and Trump's actions make it so an outside "contractor" agency can't reactivate the clearances/access to classified material w/o a full-blown new investigation.

16 posted on 08/16/2018 4:35:24 AM PDT by trebb (So many "experts" with so little experience in what they preach....even here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson