Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anne of Rainbow Gables? The LGBT Agenda and a Children’s Classic
Breakpoint.org ^ | 8-7-2018 | Eric Metaxas & Anne Morse

Posted on 08/09/2018 7:48:00 AM PDT by servo1969

When a classic children's book gets turned into a TV series, it's usually a cause for celebration. Usually.

One of the most endearing and enduring books for kids is Anne of Green Gables, a 1908 novel about a Canadian orphan who is adopted by a brother and sister on Prince Edward Island.

It's been filmed a number of times over the years. And given the non-stop campaign to normalize the LGBT lifestyle, it should come as no surprise that the most recent version introduces several homosexual characters.

The Netflix series, titled "Anne with an E," just began its second season. The episodes are charming--until you get to episode seven, in which Anne, her friend Diana Berry, and a boy named Cole attend a gathering at the home of Diana's great-Aunt Josephine. It turns out the party is a "queer soiree," featuring men dressed as women, and wearing heavy makeup, and women dressed as men. They are there to honor the memory of Josephine's departed "partner," Gertrude.

Looking around her, Anne exclaims to Diana, "Isn't this the most amazing group of people!" Well, I can't help thinking that if a sheltered young girl like Anne actually encountered cross-dressing men and women in 1908, she would be shocked and probably frightened--not delighted.

In a scene that takes place in Aunt Josephine's bedroom, Anne observes a novel on Josephine's nightstand. Gertrude was reading it the year before. Josephine tells her the books "sit just where she left them." Anne processes this remark, and then, enlightened, says, "That's what you meant by, in your way, you were married," she says.

"Yes," Josephine replies.

Diana--who is nonplussed by her discovery of her aunt's relationship with Gertrude, tells Anne their love affair was "unnatural."

But the boy Cole--a character who is invented for the TV series--soon straightens her out. "If your aunt lived her life feeling ... that she was broken, defective, or unnatural, and one day she met someone that made her realize that wasn't true . . .shouldn't we be happy for her?"

Cole later confesses to Aunt Josephine that he thinks he is "like you and Gertrude." Josephine tells him, "You have a life of such joy before you."

And in case you missed the gay-is-good point of the episode, the writers have Anne asking another character: "How can there be anything wrong with a life if it's spent with a person you love?"

To answer Anne's question: Plenty. People have suffered greatly through inappropriate "love": For instance, a child whose father decided to love someone other than his wife, or a child who is loved, in an erotic way, by an adult.

It's unlikely that Anne would ever have heard a sermon about homosexuality in her day and age. If she had, she would have known what scripture teaches about homosexual relationships: that they run counter to God's plan for human flourishing.

The gay-themed episode of "Anne with an E" has led many parents to turn the channel. As one of them wrote on the Facebook page of a Christian film review site, "The gay agenda completely ruined a perfectly heartwarming and uplifting story." Another wrote, "I just want wholesome-and no agenda."

Amen to that. Look, the secular world understands the importance of worldview teaching just as Christians do--and often teaches through films and TV programs.

It will become harder and harder to avoid the "gay is good" message in the media. Which is why, as John Stonestreet says, we need to train our children to ask questions about the ideas and characters they encounter. Help them discern truth from error. Because the truth of how God designed human sexuality remains, no matter how LGBT-saturated entertainment gets.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: childrensliterature; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: servo1969

......”The gay agenda completely ruined a perfectly heartwarming and uplifting story” .........

Gays will always interject and peddle their agenda in whatever/wherever they are involved, knowingly and not. It goes with the self-deception their life is ruled by.


21 posted on 08/09/2018 9:02:38 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celerity
Anything Netflex puts out is going to have overtones or blatantly show the left agenda's deviant side. It's what they are today.
22 posted on 08/09/2018 9:06:22 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I love the book series. But my daughter and I won’t be watching anymore episodes of Anne with an E. LMM would be appalled at what’s been done to her books, I think.


23 posted on 08/09/2018 9:07:58 AM PDT by knittnmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

The “old” series is just exquisite. We watched the original in 1980’s and video taped it to share with those who missed it. Now my grand daughters watch it, it is truly a classic. Ann(e) on Netflix is a pc travesty and yet another revision of history to drag a classic into trash.


24 posted on 08/09/2018 9:19:00 AM PDT by georgiegirl (Count me Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks

“1985 CBC Anne of Green Gables was the best.”

I agree. I was amazed by that show.

I was puzzled why Netflix decided to remake the story. Maybe we now know.

I have Netflix and watch a lot of shows, but not any that were done by Netflix. Exception: “The Crown”. But it has a scene where the word “cu*t” is used, and another scene where the phrase “lets fu*k” is used. And there is an episode where very explicit sexual activity is depicted.


25 posted on 08/09/2018 9:31:54 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

The total and complete legalization and glorification of sexual perversion by God-less democrats would have not been possible if the vast majority of republicans voters had put up any kind of fight. Anyone with a brain knows homosexuality is a mental disorder. We didn’t fight back when these bastards started teaching this garbage in public schools. Republican politicians never fight for what they believe in. Does anyone think that if Anthony Kennedy had use common sense and the court hadn’t gave the country queer “marriage” that democrats would have rolled over and said “okie doke, no problem”, the Supreme Court has spoken.”Hell no they would have never said that and would have marched in the streets to voice their anger. But of course republican voters did nothing and that’s what’s wrong with this country. Good people with morals and common sense have to stand up to tyranny but in this country the God-less party always gets what they want because they never shut up and republicans don’t know how to fight for what’s right,


26 posted on 08/09/2018 9:35:07 AM PDT by NKP_Vet ("Man without God descends into madness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I’ve been enjoying watching this. Sad to see them throw in their ritual brainwashing BS. :(


27 posted on 08/09/2018 10:11:47 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Anne Teaches America’s Kids About Anal Sex With An e.


28 posted on 08/09/2018 11:38:03 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Subscribers to Netflix should demand to know whether signing up meant giving Netflix the right to proselytize viewers on loony left-wing issues.

ACTION NOW——THEY NEED TO GET THOUSANDS OF LETTERS INFORMING THEM YOU ARE COMMISSIONING AN INDEPENDENT AUDIT OF YOUR ACCOUNT AND ITS HANDLING OF FEES.... .for the following reasons:

According to the Association of CPA’s, an audit is a systematic and independent examination of books, accounts, statutory records, documents and vouchers of an organization (non-profit or publicly-held) to ascertain authenticity of financial statements as well as non-financial disclosures and to codify that the account presents a true and fair view of the issues at hand.

An audit also attempts to ensure that the account is properly maintained as required by federal and state law. The auditor perceives and recognises the issues, and conducts a examination, obtains evidence, evaluates the same, and formulates an opinion on the basis of informed judgement which is communicated through an audit report.

Issues such as soliciting subscribers, collecting fees for service, billing procedures, and the detailed reporting of these issues. This includes the federal government, state government, the SEC, Banking oversight agencies, ERISA, insurance and other liability companies.

Areas commonly audited include: compliance audits, internal controls, quality management, project management, and collection and disposition of public monies. As a result of an audit, principles and stake-holders may effectively evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, for the edification of the relevant federal and state governance agencies and taxpayers with a financial stake in the subject matter.

Financial audits are commonly performed to ascertain the validity and reliability of information, as well as to provide an assessment of a system’s internal control. As a result of this, each party can have an accounting given on financial statements based on on the audit evidence
obtained.

Due to constraints and limitations that might be placed on the auditor, an audit seeks to provide reasonable assurance that the statements are free from material error. In the case of financial audits, a set of financial statements are said to be true and fair when they are free of material misstatements – a concept influenced by both quantitative (numerical) and qualitative factors.

Copies of the audit are to be provided to federal and state governments, the SEC, the FCC, investors, including banking, legal oversight agencies, liability companies and other oversight agencies, and officials of the state and federal government deemed stakeholders in the resultant financial accounting.


29 posted on 08/09/2018 5:05:19 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Looking around her, Anne exclaims to Diana, "Isn't this the most amazing group of people!" Well, I can't help thinking that if a sheltered young girl like Anne actually encountered cross-dressing men and women in 1908, she would be shocked and probably frightened--not delighted.

Maybe, maybe not. She wouldn't have thought they were "homosexual" or "lesbian," just that they were strange or different. A lot depends on how they presented themselves.

Women in suits or smoking cigars or men doing needlepoint would have been different, but a sheltered young girl back might not have automatically have connected such strange customs with aberrant sexual activity.

That doesn't mean people have to make or watch television shows about it now.

30 posted on 08/09/2018 5:17:35 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline
I was puzzled why Netflix decided to remake the story. Maybe we now know.

Money is the reason. But today everything in North American television has a gay angle somewhere.

31 posted on 08/09/2018 5:19:03 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson