Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tiki

EXACTLY. No way do I believe the Dems had 87% turnout.


35 posted on 08/08/2018 6:21:41 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: NEMDF

You’re right, its too much. I’m in a neighboring district and there’s no way any party is going to get 87% turnout in a special election. It’s a number that would be hard to reach in a presidential election year, much less an off-year, much less a special election.


39 posted on 08/08/2018 6:27:23 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: NEMDF
"EXACTLY. No way do I believe the Dems had 87% turnout."

Smells to high even, Miz Ortez won w/ 13%, norms are 30 to 40%.

And worse I bet the S.O.S. in OH is a Kasich Toadie and will do ugats to look into this, aka purge the voter roles of the dead, felons, snow-birders, and students voting when they shouldn't and all the other DNC tricks they use.

Tell me where I am wrong here...

40 posted on 08/08/2018 6:29:32 AM PDT by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: NEMDF

I think it is 87% of the 2016 total turnout, not 87% turnout. Still seems too high.


47 posted on 08/08/2018 6:34:52 AM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson