“Tricky legal language may be the fraud if they are manipulating content for religious and political reasons, especially if the President of the United States is using their platform.”
Learn to read, or hire a lawyer.
The fact that the President of the United States uses a particular social media platform has no bearing whatsoever on said platform’s TOS.
“Are you a lawyer and have you read their TOS?”
I’m not on Twitter thus have no reason to read their TOS. However, I am 100% certain that every member of Twitter has read and fully understands the TOS.
If for some reason someone did agree to the TOS without reading and understanding the TOS, they are incompetent or foolish.
” I am 100% certain that every member of Twitter has read and fully understands the TOS.”
Heh. That’s funny. Brings back memories of The Human Centipad.
Again, tricky legal language in a TOS that does not cover shadow banning or other manipulations of user information or postings is, on its face, fraud,
Because it is constructed to deceive, tricky legal language can be Fraud... especially if shadow banning is not spelled out.
Your response tells me that there is probably a lawsuit here;
And if you don’t go on Twitter, how do you know anything about shadow banning?
Answer: you don’t know what shadow banning even is, so why are you so defensive about it?
Shadow banning on its face means that the users do NOT know their data is being manipulated for political purposes. It if is not expressly spelled out in the TOS, this is fraudulent dealing..
There is no free pass for a company to deceive its users for political purposes.