Again, tricky legal language in a TOS that does not cover shadow banning or other manipulations of user information or postings is, on its face, fraud,
Because it is constructed to deceive, tricky legal language can be Fraud... especially if shadow banning is not spelled out.
Your response tells me that there is probably a lawsuit here;
And if you don’t go on Twitter, how do you know anything about shadow banning?
Answer: you don’t know what shadow banning even is, so why are you so defensive about it?
Shadow banning on its face means that the users do NOT know their data is being manipulated for political purposes. It if is not expressly spelled out in the TOS, this is fraudulent dealing..
There is no free pass for a company to deceive its users for political purposes.
The data you post on Twitter does not belong to you.
“Because it is constructed to deceive, tricky legal language can be Fraud...”
If you cannot read tricky language, hire a lawyer.