Skip to comments.
Ninth Circuit Rules Openly Carrying Firearm in Public Is Constitutional
breitbart.com ^
| 7/24/2018
| AWR Hawkins
Posted on 07/24/2018 10:15:43 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: rktman
When the 9th Circus starts following the constitution, it can only mean the end is near!
21
posted on
07/24/2018 10:23:22 AM PDT
by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho) to sun spot6)
To: ChuckHam
Damp what is wrong with those mainland judges? Were they believing what Yamamoto said about the America having a gun behind every blade of grass? This is Hawaii, the hideout of the fraud.
22
posted on
07/24/2018 10:23:31 AM PDT
by
Mouton
(The media is the enemy of the people.)
To: G Larry
What's that mean in English? The ruling was by a three judge panel. So only three judges on the 9th circuit made this ruling. En Banc means they want the entire 9th circus to rule on the case. Obviously this three judge panel did not include most of the real nutso judges who infest this circuit court.
23
posted on
07/24/2018 10:23:48 AM PDT
by
Freedumb
To: JamesP81
So can I carry now in California?
24
posted on
07/24/2018 10:24:07 AM PDT
by
mplc51
To: circlecity
“”What’s that mean in English?”
It means the entire panel of 9th Circuit judges would rule on it rather than the three judge panel that just issued the ruling. “
Not entirely correct. In the Ninth Circuit, an en-banc is eleven justices, not the whole court. The whole court is something on the order of 28 justices.
To: rktman
pinch me..!
omg this is fantastic..!
First high-cap mags, now THIS..!
26
posted on
07/24/2018 10:25:56 AM PDT
by
gaijin
To: Gay State Conservative
As would be expected. Then on to new SCOTUS villain Kavanagh for a ruling? LOL! That may worry them even more.
27
posted on
07/24/2018 10:26:01 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: 1Old Pro
What next, the media will take a break from their 24/7 anti Trump vitriol?
Aw, come on, lets not go crazy here.
28
posted on
07/24/2018 10:27:15 AM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: rktman
And, lo, the rivers shall run red as blood,
locusts shall blot out the Sun,
and the 9th Circuit shall uphold the Second Amendment.
- Breaking of the Seventh Seal, Verse 22
To: rktman
Wow!
Blind Pig Finds Acorn!
Film at eleven!.....................
30
posted on
07/24/2018 10:28:36 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH......Q Anon)
To: Bob434
You must have missed the sub-paragraphs to the 2nd where it states stuff about permits, bump stocks, assault style rifles, spray fire weapons, etc., etc., etc. It’s a couple paragraphs before the right to abortion amendment.
31
posted on
07/24/2018 10:28:37 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: servo1969
Satan shall open a skating rink in Hades.
32
posted on
07/24/2018 10:29:35 AM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(Papa Johns is being changed to Politically Correct Pizza! Look for our new signs.)
To: rktman
33
posted on
07/24/2018 10:29:55 AM PDT
by
GOP Poet
To: mplc51
Your mileage may vary..................
34
posted on
07/24/2018 10:30:09 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH......Q Anon)
To: mplc51
Sure. Go or it. Send us the address to which hoosegow you end up in. Just cause the 9th says it’s okay, doesn’t actually meant that it’s ok. LOL! We know how that goes.
35
posted on
07/24/2018 10:30:21 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: rktman
The Second Amendment grants no rights. It very simply, clearly and undeniably prohibits the government from regulating or criminalizing the possession or bearing of arms. And explains the reason for the prohibition is that the keeping and bearing of arms by adult citizens (”the militia”) is “necessary to the security of a free state.”
36
posted on
07/24/2018 10:31:33 AM PDT
by
sourcery
(Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
To: rktman
So I can wear this today?
37
posted on
07/24/2018 10:32:17 AM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: sourcery
Did you see my post #31? YUGE /S needed.
38
posted on
07/24/2018 10:33:34 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: Yaelle
As long as it’s not concealed you may be okay. But, just cause they said okay doesn’t necessarily mean ‘okay’.
39
posted on
07/24/2018 10:35:15 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: Moonman62
Worlds are colliding in liberal land!
40
posted on
07/24/2018 10:39:22 AM PDT
by
ealgeone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson