Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Deep State counterattack is underway. Break out your hip boots.
1 posted on 07/22/2018 7:33:24 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

Carter Page WAS a Russian spy... FOR THE FBI.

Funny they didn’t mention that in the FISA application.


2 posted on 07/22/2018 7:34:51 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=600><p>https://i.imgur.com/zXSEP5Z.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

I see Wapo, I usually stop reading.


3 posted on 07/22/2018 7:37:35 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

Oh so that’s their spin

What universe are these people living in?


4 posted on 07/22/2018 7:38:10 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

8 posted on 07/22/2018 7:39:37 PM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

Byron York wrote a good column on July 22 that came to a totally different conclusion. He docuuments that Nune’s 12 paragraphs are correct.


10 posted on 07/22/2018 7:46:40 PM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
The information from the Steele dossier comprises the next 4 1/2 pages, excluding footnotes. It is followed by Page's public response to reports that he was under investigation, a response triggered by the Yahoo article. That response runs for about 3 1/2 pages and makes up the fourth section of the report. Five fully redacted pages, making up the fifth and sixth section of the report follow, leading to the document's conclusion. It's clear that the information uncovered by Steele does play a prominent role...

I'm tempted to stop reading right there, because it's all I need to say that
1.) This is exactly what Nunes said,
2.) Steele is not American, therefore this is foreign influence,
3.) Hillary paid for it, so there's your collusion, and
4.) Any intelligence officer who denied this to Congress under oath then lied under oath.

I don't know what else there is to say about any of it.

11 posted on 07/22/2018 7:47:07 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
It’s clear that the information uncovered by Steele does play a prominent role. It’s impossible to say how critical it was to the warrant, though, because so much of the document is redacted.

How convenient.

22 posted on 07/22/2018 8:04:36 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

hmmmmm...

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fisa-warrant-application-supports-nunes-memo


24 posted on 07/22/2018 8:07:04 PM PDT by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

Bump


26 posted on 07/22/2018 8:12:02 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

Reminds me of the Black Knight from Monty Python: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKhEw7nD9C4


27 posted on 07/22/2018 8:25:44 PM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

Re Bump’s asinine comment that Page “was a target of the Russians” as though that was a crime on Page’s part.

Go to the site www.keywiki.org, search under “Edward Kennedy”, not “Ted”, and read the FBI report entitled “Contacts Between Representatives of the Soviet Union and members or Staff Personnel of the United States Congress” Internal Security - Russia (TOP SECRET) July 28, 1970 about who in Congress was “targeted” by the KGB for possible influence (and implied recruitment even if they didn’t know about it).

The list included Sen. Edward Brooke (a moderate Republican, a logical Soviet target for influencing through disinformation).
Ellender - LA - liberal to slightly conservative
Fulbright - D. I’m sure they got to him through his aides (i.e. disinformation re Vietnam and the “arms race”)
Hatfield - R. A so-called “pacifist” who sided with the Reds on a lot of issues. More a “moral coward” than a defender of the faith and America.
EDWARD KENNEDY - Mass. D - one of the key targets of the Soviets. Personally I suspected one of his aides on a subcommittee as being pro-Hanoi. That’s just me but when you read what he wrote, you’ll understand why I distrusted him.
Mansfield - Moderate Democrat but on the slightly dovish side. Key foreign policy senator
Eugene McCarthy - the biggest Soviet dupe on the Senate.
McGovern - already pro-communist since his WW2 days and his theology school days, McGovern would be the perfect KGB dupe and much of his foreign policy statements sounds like they were made in Moscow or Hanoi.
Mondale - another “dupe”. Could sell him the Brooklyn Bridge and tell him it was in Florida.
Muskie - Another “weak” Democrat re foreign policy. An easy target for the Reds.
Rep. James G. Fulton - R-Pa. Jimmy was a stanch anti-communist and therefore he would have to be coopted or compromised by some scandal Fortunately he was smarter than that. He encouraged me to expose a Hanoi operation in the U.S., which I did.
Robert Leggett - D - leftist (calif). A perfect target for the KGB. He was already predisposed to Soviet policies
Sen. Donald Riegle (R-Mich). A closet hard left Republican who would be more useful to the Soviet as a Republican than as a Democrat. Check out his voting record on US foreign policies. It will hit you in the face like a sledge hammer.

Soviet contacts with the Sen. Foreign Relations Committee, the House Foreign Affairs Committee and both the Sen. and House Armed Services Committee were discussed in this memo.
It is enlightening and this is only for the period up to 1970.

Communist penetration of Congressional staffs rose during the late 60s/early 70’s including that of Rep. George Miller ),(D-Cal), a hardcore communist sympathizer; Ron Dellums (D-Ca), another hardcore red himself - he hired communists/Marxists for his staff; and Bella Abzug (D-NY). If you worked for Bella, you had to know that she was a communist. Even her best liberals friends said so.

In the 80’s, Sen. John Kerry hired a Marxist freak show of people as staffers and consultants/parttimes (Porter, Varelli, possibly Avirgan).

Anyone working for Rep. Don Edwards (D-CA) and the Burton Brothers (D-CA) knew they were far-left communist sympathizers or “anti-anti-communists” (Edwards was all of them). The same for George Crockett Jr (D-Mich), Comrade John Conyers (D-Mich), Crazy Ryan of NY (killed by Rev. Jim Jones at Jonestown, Kastenmaier (D-Wisc), crazy Don Fraser - Minn; etc.

The other known CPUSA member in Congress in the 50’s or early 60’s was Hugh DeLacey (D-Ca), one of Leon Panetta’s mentors and best friends. The other CPUSA-lining representative was the one-termer Charles O. Porter (D-Wash or Oregon). He toed the Red line on every foreign policy issue.

Parren Mitchell (D-Md). I suspected him of being a Soviet asset due to his close connection to Baltimore Communists and an identified Soviet spy from WW2.

There were others but I just wanted to repeat these names in light of the FBI memo of 1970. If anyone was “colluding with the Soviets/Russians” in Congress, it was the Democrats, period.

A full investigation of these people, over time, would shock America to its core, and destroy the Democrat Party.


36 posted on 07/22/2018 10:36:21 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

The document proves the dossier was a central element of the application, and it proves the court was not candidly advised of the provenance of the dossier. The WaPo spin falls flat in the face of those facts.

This will do until the redactions are removed. The swamp water is being heated gradually.


37 posted on 07/23/2018 2:50:04 AM PDT by JustaTech (A mind is a terrible thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

Philip Bump? That’s a name? What psycho ward did the WaPo find him in?


38 posted on 07/23/2018 2:52:03 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

Too funny - what Nunes says is only 25 times stronger than the arguments of the anti-Trump folks/deep State, so Nunes must be full of it.....


39 posted on 07/23/2018 3:46:50 AM PDT by trebb (Too many "Conservatives" who think their opinions outweigh reality these days...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

How is it possible to even make this argument when most of what was released was redacted???


45 posted on 07/23/2018 5:50:14 AM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson