Here you go (hint, filing party’s name goes before the v., sued party’s name after the v. Frequently the defendants are listed in Alphabetical order in the complaint, cause references the first named defendant)
MGM Resorts International Inc. v. Acosta
Case No. 18-cv-01288
United States District Court for the District of Nevada
MGM Resorts International Inc. v. Aase
Case No. 18-cv-06113
United States District Court for the Central District of California
You’re trying to make an arcane point I wasn’t addressing, it seems.
The article makes it seem like the company went out on it’s own, looked up the names of all the victims and decided to sue them out of the blue.
In fact, as you’ve verified, these suits are in response to people who already sued them or stated intention to sue.
That puts things in a different perspective.
If you are saying countersue is not the technically correct term, I won’t argue.