Posted on 07/16/2018 10:00:55 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Sometime last January, several agents belonging to Israel's intelligence service Mossad, approached a non-descript warehouse in Tehran. After disabling a few alarms and bypassing other security measures, the agents entered the building.
The agents had hit the jackpot. Over 61/2 hours, the agents removed tens of thousands of documents relating to Iran's nuclear program. The documents included warhead designs and information on how other countries had assisted Iran in their nuclear program.
The upshot is that the documents - as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a speech last April when he made the raid public - prove that Iran has been lying about its nuclear program.
A large team of Israeli experts has continued to mine the document trove for new revelations while simultaneously sharing the material with U.S. and European intelligence agencies as well as with the International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA, the U.N. watchdog in charge of monitoring Iran’s nuclear activity. Officials shared recent discoveries with a small group of Western news outlets last week, arguing that the newly uncovered evidence of Tehran’s advanced nuclear weapons research — along with its elaborate efforts to conceal the activity while preserving the technical know-how for possible future use — shows that Iran cannot be trusted. Iran has disputed the authenticity of the documents obtained by Israel, calling them forgeries. Officials at Iran’s U.N. mission in New York did not reply to a request for comment.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I’d be very curious as to how the IAEA will react to these documents.
But then again, they’ll issue at best a mild admonishment of Iran and move on to the next “issue”.
Storage Wars....best find.
Oh no! The Iranians lied?!?
Can my worldview stand the shock?
Dave Hester is bitching about it because he never got a chance to bid.
News from 30-40 days ago?
The key will be to keep the focus on Israelis breaking into the warehouse rather than the “supposed, probably fabricated” documents
When I first read that I misread it as IKEA....
How many times are the names Obama and Jarrett mentioned?
Old news and was big news at the time, so why are they bringing it up again? Something going on?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.