On occasion jeffersondem suggested family & friends in the South, but so far as I've seen, nothing else to provide us a personal picture of "him" or even if he is "him".
He does have a vocabulary suggesting some education, but where?
And his approach to issues I'd call lawyerly, meaning always looking for an issue to exploit rather than, for example, what was the real truth of a matter?
In this particular exchange, we see jmacusa's review of the wickedness of Democrats, to which jeffersondem responds: No, no, Northerners were just as evil, if not more so because they chose Union over abolition in 1788 and then in 1861 Northerners went to war to save the Union, not end slavery, so you see, it was all Northerners' fault, says jeffersondem.
Indeed, jeffersondem even reduced the wickedness to a simple fraction:
So jeffersondem is very generously willing to allow a 4/13 (~31%) share of responsibility to the South, but the rest was all Northerners' fault, doncha' know?
And the proof of it is?
Of course, since jmacusa is a bit confused about Thomas Jefferson's role in the 1787 Constitution Convention, he's obviously wrong about pretty much everything, so 4/13 it is, all the rest is damnyankees fault!
I'd call that lawyerly, certainly not expressions of someone defending truth in history.
As for Hillary, who needs Democrats to oppose us when we have the likes of jeffersondem on our side?
The other question Mr jeffersondem refuses to answer is were his ancestors Confederates and slave owners.
Not this planet...