Scott Adams is an idiot and should stick to the cartoon. His Periscope on Strozck’s testimony was ludicrous. He said that Strozck was “credible” when he testified that his “we’ll stop it” text to Page didn’t mean what it most certainly meant. I quit following Adams on Twitter immediately. Just another California Cool egghead.
I think Scott Adams chooses to defend the other side because they want to be seen as somewhat non-partisan.
We definitely need people in the middle if we hope to save the country. Besides, Adams gave perfectly good reasons why he believes Stozck’s claim that “we will stop him [Trump]” meant stopping Trump politically.
On FR I regularly make private (anonymous) comments that I would be not want to make public.
Adams did not say Strozck was innocent overall.