Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

Not only has the mission profile expanded, but the potential threat environment has grown to include orbital and hypersonic weapons that might be fired well beyond the former threat envelops. Also, many weapons they will face may have terminal maneuverability making them much more difficult to destroy. As you layer on each new threat you have two choices; make the ship bigger to hold more defenses, or make it smaller so it will be a more difficult target. I’m guessing the Navy will go with the former.


3 posted on 07/12/2018 7:41:05 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gen.Blather
As you layer on each new threat you have two choices; make the ship bigger to hold more defenses, or make it smaller so it will be a more difficult target. I’m guessing the Navy will go with the former.

If the role was merely to defend ownship, sure, make it smaller and more maneuverable with a low cross section and robust self defense capacity. But the mission of these ships is to defend the battle group and/or other designated assets. Can't make the carriers smaller realistically. So either more defenders or more capable defenders are called for,

10 posted on 07/12/2018 8:37:59 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Russians couldnt have done a better job destroying sacred American institutions than Democrats have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson