Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luke21
Both sides? When did Republicans slander Democrat nominees? RBG? Breyer? Kagan? The wise Latina? Not buying.

It's become political because one side opposes the other side's judicial nominees solely for political purposes. If you don't think the Republicans have been as active as that as the Democrats have been then you're just kidding yourself.

14 posted on 07/10/2018 4:22:41 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

“If you don’t think the Republicans have been as active as that as the Democrats have been then you’re just kidding yourself.”

Say what? Not only is your grammar bad, you don’t know what you are talking about. The Republicans gave Clinton and Obama whoever they wanted and barely opposed their SC choices four different times. The Dems meanwhile, defeated Bork, poisoned the well against Douglas Ginzburg and turned the Thomas hearings into a national spectacle. You make no sense at all with your blame both sides approach. That simply isn’t true. The GOP goes along with Democrat presidents when they recommend SC justices.

McConnell finally ended the lopsidedness after Democrats filibustered Bush’s appellate choices and then abolished the filibuster. McConnell said enough was enough and hoisted them by their own petard.


18 posted on 07/10/2018 4:36:02 PM PDT by Luke21 (The Hill sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson