He cites actual cases and Kavaenaughs opinions in or on the cases he cites, and that case law is his source, there is nothing “anonympus” there.
I support Trump but I do not think he is G-d, perfect, and cannot error.
I have no desire to join knee-jerk reactions to all criticism of some choice or decision Trump makes; as so many do, with no analysis at all, as if someone MUST be wrong just because they don’t agree with Trump or a decision he’s made.
Why don’t you try explaining why you disagree with the author by your own expostion of the cases he presented and Kavanaugh’s role in them.
Amen. Let be honest and have a discussion. So it’s anonymous, who cares? There was no ad hominem attacks on the man in the article.
If a guy isn’t able to put his name on something, it isn’t worth reading.
He wouldn’t even stand behind the information and his spin on it.
Why should I?
Sorry, this is a hit job from a sniper too chickensh— to do his deed out in the open.
Makes you wonder just which NeverTrumper it is.
I don’t disagree with the line of reasoning behind your post, to an extent, but I’m not blindly defending Trump or Kavanaugh here.
The writer should stand up like a man and defend his accusations and spin.