Open the can of worms. Very worthwhile read.
Does this explain why no one wants the can of worms actually opened?
YES YES YES etc etc etc
ReallY??? IS that even a question any thinking person anymore?
Of course they did. They are just as corrupt and dirty as the Clintons.......................
Yes.
Yes. Can it be proven (in the swamp)…No.
You left out Australia and New Zealand.
Let’s not banty about words. It’s called “High Treason”, and goes up to Obama and thousands of his minions.
Yes.
And nothing will be done about it.
They are forgetting the most important aspect of all this:
RUSSIA! RUSSIA!! RUSSIA!!!
No one wants to open the can of worms because it all leads back to Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009 when BOTH parties colluded to violate the Constitution and allow an ineligible usurper to be sworn in as President.
Does this explain why no one wants the can of worms actually opened?
**************
Prolly right. And the likelihood that it was all engineered, put in motion, and covered up by Obama. The very same White House that wanted to “know everything”.
Yes and they continue to do so with placement of key players into management positions in established media outlets.
Throw the worldwide Deep State controlled MSM into that mix too. They had a part in this crap too! There are a lot of people with “dirty” hands in this business, and they all know it!
Yes and no.
I don’t think the call was up to the rank and file, but certainly Brennan, Clapper and Comey/McCabe was. Lynch approved, and so did Obama, Susan Rice and Valerie (looks like Planet of the Apes chimpwoman) Jarret; all had their parts to play.
They should all be doing serious time in the Big House.
Some people say they should all be swinging from a rope.
That can is full of Red State worms, Blue State worms, and Deep State worms. To open it truthfully would prove what we all know, the government is almost totally corrupt and self-serving. The people be damned.
Wake me when someone actually goes to jail for doing it. We have one person who was forced out and that was for lying internally.
YES!
No prosecution though. They’re democraps.
The headline actually understates the point: did the intelligence community collude to frame Trump as an agent of a foreign power.
I’m starting to think that this is the only thing that makes sense. Something didn’t sit right with me when Cankles was spouting off about 17 intelligence agencies confirming Russia’s collusion into our election during the debates. That’s really specific info she has, I was thinking.
This only makes sense if she and Obummer were using the same playbook the whole time.
Yes, they did. Intelligent people new this on the night of 8 November 2016 before all the polls were closed when the DNC’s toadies in the “mainstream media” were saying that “all 17 intelligence agencies” were investigating Trump for “colluding with da Russkis”. Crapper, Comey and Brennan were throwing bigger tantrums and crying harder than Podesta.