To: Simon Green
A last meal for the condemned has a long tradition behind it. In some ways it symbolizes that it's not an act of hatred or anger toward the person about to die. It's the state's way of saying "no hard feelings, we are only doing what must be done, and we do empathize with your situation." The condemned prisoner accepting the meal is symbolic of him or her accepting fate, and letting justice run its course. Also with no hard feelings toward the state and those involved in his or her execution.
It's a small thing, but an act of civility that separates America from too many other places in this world.
31 posted on
07/09/2018 8:09:51 AM PDT by
Ciaphas Cain
("Progressivism" is as every kind of evil: it can never create, only corrupt and destroy.)
To: Ciaphas Cain
The condemned are considered taboo. Sacred yet forbidden. So a final meal is proscribed and justice is fulfilled.
54 posted on
07/09/2018 8:51:06 AM PDT by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
To: Ciaphas Cain
I see your point, but I find it difficult to square with the heinous, cruel, and sadisitic way in which many of these murderers took their victims’ lives. “Last meals” didn’t even come into it for those victims, not remotely.
73 posted on
07/09/2018 10:48:40 AM PDT by
mrsmel
(I wonÂ’t be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson