Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Simon Green
A last meal for the condemned has a long tradition behind it. In some ways it symbolizes that it's not an act of hatred or anger toward the person about to die. It's the state's way of saying "no hard feelings, we are only doing what must be done, and we do empathize with your situation." The condemned prisoner accepting the meal is symbolic of him or her accepting fate, and letting justice run its course. Also with no hard feelings toward the state and those involved in his or her execution.

It's a small thing, but an act of civility that separates America from too many other places in this world.

31 posted on 07/09/2018 8:09:51 AM PDT by Ciaphas Cain ("Progressivism" is as every kind of evil: it can never create, only corrupt and destroy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ciaphas Cain

The condemned are considered taboo. Sacred yet forbidden. So a final meal is proscribed and justice is fulfilled.


54 posted on 07/09/2018 8:51:06 AM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Ciaphas Cain

I see your point, but I find it difficult to square with the heinous, cruel, and sadisitic way in which many of these murderers took their victims’ lives. “Last meals” didn’t even come into it for those victims, not remotely.


73 posted on 07/09/2018 10:48:40 AM PDT by mrsmel (I wonÂ’t be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson