Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
Mobile NYT ^ | July 8, 2018 | Andrew Jacobs

Posted on 07/08/2018 2:56:06 PM PDT by gattaca

A resolution to encourage breast-feeding was expected to be approved quickly and easily by the hundreds of government delegates who gathered this spring in Geneva for the United Nations-affiliated World Health Assembly.

Based on decades of research, the resolution says that mother’s milk is healthiest for children and countries should strive to limit the inaccurate or misleading marketing of breast milk substitutes.

Then the United States delegation, embracing the interests of infant formula manufacturers, upended the deliberations...

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: colorado tanker

I know why they/we did it!

Daddies can’t! We demand equal rights for MEN!!!


41 posted on 07/08/2018 5:17:53 PM PDT by Flintlock (The ballot box STOLEN, our soapbox taken away--the BULLET BOX is left to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Agreed.

God designed the breast and its purpose.

A newborn needs mother’s milk if at all possible:

Immunoglobulin factors, probiotics, enzymes, essential fatty acids, as well as the optimal protein, fat, and carbkhydrate profile for a human.


42 posted on 07/08/2018 5:22:29 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Knowing the UN they probably snuck some sanctions against Israel into this resolution.


43 posted on 07/09/2018 6:04:25 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

If that’s the case, the title of this article could read ‘WHO trying to block 3rd world nations from Baby formula supply’. Interesting how a title can spin the narrative.


44 posted on 07/09/2018 9:18:03 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24

This is referring mainly to 3rd world nations where pumping may not be an option.


45 posted on 07/09/2018 9:19:07 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
A truth that's told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent.

William Blake.

46 posted on 07/09/2018 9:20:22 AM PDT by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

.
The US is definitely in the wrong on this in a big way!
.


47 posted on 07/09/2018 10:16:35 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
Experience tells me that there is more to this story.

There always is.

48 posted on 07/09/2018 10:19:30 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Cui bono?


49 posted on 07/09/2018 10:20:26 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3669551/posts


50 posted on 07/09/2018 10:45:38 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (President Trump divides Americans . . . from anti-Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

“Seems like an odd decision and if based on marketing of infant formula, shame on us.”

Given that this is the NYT reporting, and also given that we are not provided the actual language of the administration’s requested changes, we must logically assume that this is simply another fake-news hit piece.

Until I see the actual language the administration was pushing, I’ll continue to give Trump the benefit of the doubt.


51 posted on 07/10/2018 10:02:00 AM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson