I also said that if he did one single thing - give us a SCOTUS judge, his job would be done. He did that, and now we’re doing better than we could under another president.
But the national reciprocation is what I’m talking about. This was a campaign promise that hasn’t been fulfilled.
It would be simple to do - An EO can reaffirm a constitutionally protected right. It wouldn’t even be contended (by anyone serious. It would be by the leftist media but no constitutional lawyer could fight it - even Obama didn’t fight it)
I was thinking that he’s keeping it in his pocket for when he does something that we on the right don’t like. But that already came and went. He’s done things that have infuriated us before.
I simply don’t think gun rights are even on his list because he - like others in NYC - are “But..” patriots. He doesn’t believe that every citizen should be able to have a gun. Again, like other NYC residents believes that he is elite in many ways and that he should have these things, but there are people who shouldn’t. (Like Mets fans, for instance)
Ben Carson is a good guy. But he lost me - and I mean LOST ME when he said that people in rural areas have rights to arm and bear, but that should be limited in Urban areas. Ridiculous!
Rand Paul said that drones should be used to shoot someone as they step out of the door of the convenience store they just robbed. What ?!
I’ve been in the room with Trump before. He is not one of us. However, I will say that he is doing the best job of any recorded president in protecting us and our rights. He is not the “best of the worst” candidates. He was a real, honest pick and I would march into war to protect this man and his work for us.
When it comes to Presidents he is the best in the lineup. Simple.
I just want to know what happened to my national carry.
You provide an excellent example of why the right generally loses. "Everything right now or I'll take my ball and go home".
The left really is smarter than folks like you and most of the anti-abortion crowd - you all would rather have nothing than have a little now, a little bit more later, and more after that.
Incrementalism and the long game is what wins. Not that 'all or nothing' mentality that has lost us so much ground over the last century.
It would be simple to do - An EO can reaffirm a constitutionally protected right. It wouldn’t even be contended (by anyone serious.”
You don’t understand what an EO does.
EOs only apply to federal government workers and they do not negate state or federal laws.
Do you have a different argument?