Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tomi Lahren: Pushing to Overturn Roe v. Wade Would Be a 'Big Mistake'
FN Insider ^ | 7/7/2018 | Tomi Lahren

Posted on 07/07/2018 6:47:42 AM PDT by Boomer

Pressing for a Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade would be a big mistake.

Yes, the new high court vacancy is a huge opportunity for conservative values and principles, I get it. And I understand the passion behind the pro-life movement.

(Excerpt) Read more at insider.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; feminism; homoactivism; libtrollsunmask; propaganda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: gibsonguy
19 posts until sanity. Abortion isn't a constitutional issue; black robed tyrants made it one. RvW needs to be overturned (same too with gay marriage) on the simple grounds of construction. Let each state decide as they will.

As you say, this is a nested attack: use Roe to keep conservatives off court, with the intention of frustrating any/other state initiatives. Anyone - patriot or proglib - knows there's not a state in the union that would ban abortion upon Roe being reversed.

So, choice is not in danger. Rather, it's the left's technique of using the federal level combined with non-democratic court legislated decisions as their (not so secret) weapon.

41 posted on 07/07/2018 7:49:39 AM PDT by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
That includes allowing Gays and Trans to serve in the Armed Forces.

A (Baby) Boomer posting how appeals to emotion should overrule logic (In this case, financial/cohesion considerations) and time tested measures that work. The ban on homosexuals worked because everyone assumed there were no homosexuals (Even though they were) in the work place. Now you want to play open romper room with these with debased behaviors that offers no positivity to behavioral management that is already fragile in the military environment.

Also, Lahren is too scared she might not have the legal access to conveniently murder her offspring while whoring around. Sorry, rights end (The mother) where another begins (offspring). That is not a social issue, that is a fundamental fact. Roe V. Wade was based on lies and terrible legal reasoning. That decision deserves to be nuked and if this pisses off the "surrender"-to-win crowd, so be it. Those who dare wins; you want us to play timid scared milquetoast? Sorry, not buying what you are selling, because compromising with evil just results in evil. The Independence Committee had to fight off the "comfortable" class like yourself as well in 1776.
42 posted on 07/07/2018 7:50:14 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

It all depends on court cases and Roberts won’t take on a Roe one.


43 posted on 07/07/2018 7:53:46 AM PDT by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
Can you show me where in our constitution this issue is made clear?

Since it is not, as you say, clear in the Constitution, then the Supreme Court should have left the matter up to the states.

44 posted on 07/07/2018 7:57:37 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
Gotta say, and I understand we have a lot of pro-life Freepers, I agree with this young lady. Government has a role to play but regulating social issues is where it fails miserably. That includes allowing Gays and Trans to serve in the Armed Forces.

You couldn't be more wrong.

The very basis of our country, and our constitution is wrapped up in theses words from our Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
Your position is a position of cowardice and a lack of principle.
45 posted on 07/07/2018 7:59:34 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

End government funding and Murder Inc. will die on it’s own.


46 posted on 07/07/2018 8:01:12 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Let President Pence and VP Haley worry about the social issues, especially with a packed SCOTUS. Right now we need to get rid of everything Obama did to harm the country.

Simple answer for the SCOTUS pick is, “it’s settled law.” Let the rats defend something they already won until it is time for a case to be brought before SCOTUS getting rid of Roe v Wade.


47 posted on 07/07/2018 8:09:23 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Proud member of the DWN party. (Deplorable Wing Nut))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Czech_Occidentalist

Roberts is not that aggressive on the issue.


48 posted on 07/07/2018 8:16:35 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Protection of human life is our issue.
Justice demands that the law protect the unborn.

Citizens who refuse to stand up for the unborn are morally complicit in the killing.


49 posted on 07/07/2018 8:17:52 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (Committee to Re-Elect the President ( CREEP ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

The right to abortion isn’t in the constitution. I have read it.


50 posted on 07/07/2018 8:18:50 AM PDT by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi

You have it backwards. I’m against gays and trans in the military. That is not the place to play with social experiments. It’s a fighting and defensive force.


51 posted on 07/07/2018 8:27:19 AM PDT by Boomer (Leftism is the Mental/Moral Equivalent of End Stage Cancer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Like homicide and infantacide, the US Constitution is silent on abortion.

Before Roe v. Wage, it was a state law issue. It destroys our Constitution to have judges create new constitutional rights (such as a right to destroy children before they are born).

Ms. Lahern is a libertarian, not a conservative.

Judge Barrett or whoever President Trump appoints will hopefully restore the Constitutional order.


52 posted on 07/07/2018 8:27:38 AM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Pound sand libby.


53 posted on 07/07/2018 8:28:24 AM PDT by Boomer (Leftism is the Mental/Moral Equivalent of End Stage Cancer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GuavaCheesePuff
Whatever women do with their baby, let God judge

Oh He will, and doesn't a child have a father? Where is his voice in this matter?

54 posted on 07/07/2018 8:29:02 AM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Ronald Reagan on Protecting the Sanctity of Life
January 1, 1983

“Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. [...] Every legislator, every doctor, and every citizen needs to recognize that the real issue is whether to affirm and protect the sanctity of all human life, or to embrace a social ethic where some human lives are valued and others are not. As a nation, we must choose between the sanctity of life ethic and the “quality of life” ethic. [...] I have often said we need to join in prayer to bring protection to the unborn. Prayer and action are needed to uphold the sanctity of human life. I believe it will not be possible to accomplish our work, the work of saving lives, “without being a soul of prayer.”


A FREE nation that does not uphold the sanctity of LIFE, deserves neither.


55 posted on 07/07/2018 8:32:50 AM PDT by Gator113 ( ~~Trump 2020~~ There needs to be a quieting of the screaming lambs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

The SCOTUS do strange things at times Roberts action is a big question.


56 posted on 07/07/2018 8:34:03 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

They will have to agree on something—they say that men shouldn’t have a role. It’s a tough decision.


57 posted on 07/07/2018 8:37:22 AM PDT by GuavaCheesePuff (I want to thank the Good Lord for making me a Yankee-Old Yankee Stadium (1923-2008))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
If Roe's overturned it would mean each State would make the call on abortion being legal or not within that State.

Liberal women, Hollywood sluts, and men like Peter Fonda, DiNiro and Weinstein could still pay to have their babies killed - - even if Roe was overturned.

The 'choice' goes back to the States... I'm surprised California didn't adopt the liberal proposal that women should be able to kill their children up until their two years old. Some liberal academic proposed that a few years ago...

58 posted on 07/07/2018 8:37:24 AM PDT by GOPJ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-IsingvI_I STOP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-s1_nfs7f4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

On the pro-life/pro-choice issue; our elected congress should decide if that’s a federal issue or a states issue then vote accordingly. Another option is a compromise that keeps showing up; the 20 week rule.

________________________________________________________

But Roe vs. Wade does not allow the issue to be decided by the legislatures (federal or state). The court ruled it’s a Constitutional right based on an implied right to privacy. So you’re saying let the judiciary continue to usurp this issue from the people?


59 posted on 07/07/2018 8:38:46 AM PDT by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Killing children is not a constitutional right. There is a right to life though.


60 posted on 07/07/2018 8:42:52 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson