Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tomi Lahren: Pushing to Overturn Roe v. Wade Would Be a 'Big Mistake'
FN Insider ^ | 7/7/2018 | Tomi Lahren

Posted on 07/07/2018 6:47:42 AM PDT by Boomer

Pressing for a Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade would be a big mistake.

Yes, the new high court vacancy is a huge opportunity for conservative values and principles, I get it. And I understand the passion behind the pro-life movement.

(Excerpt) Read more at insider.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; feminism; homoactivism; libtrollsunmask; propaganda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: Boomer
Tomi,

Quit your whining.

Its not like Trump sets the courts agenda to ask them to rule on a particular issue.

It is unlikely that anything would come up during Trump's term to put this on their plate.

Even if they did overturn it, it would still be up to each state to rule on.

This is largely a Dem fundraising ploy.

21 posted on 07/07/2018 7:14:34 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Quinnipiac surveys on that issue are skewed by subjectively motivated methods. Allowing yourselves to be manipulated by an obscenely noisy 2% of the population is foolish. So is believing that a large portion of our nation supports such unhealthy and disgusting activities being shoved in the face of America.


22 posted on 07/07/2018 7:17:01 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

At what age do you grant rights? Why do you get to decide? This country was founded on the basis that The Creator has given rights equally to all? You don’t believe in equal rights, you believe in rights, whenever someone decides.
This practice started the roll down the slippery slope and we are at the edge of atheistic dark ages, again. The belief that survival of the fittest means consumption of the weakest, innocent.
Those beliefs are one hundred percent opposite the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and the historic struggle of the settlers and founders. The Creator granted rights equally to all.. there is no age in any founding documents.
Barbarism.


23 posted on 07/07/2018 7:17:06 AM PDT by momincombatboots (No Wall, No Way 2018)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

I’m somewhat in the same camp. I don’t like abortion but I accept women will get them whether they are legal or not. I’d rather they got them by qualified care-givers than some schmuck with a coat hanger in the back room with a bottle of vodka for sterility.

In a perfect world both the men and women (boys and girls) would take precautions so a pregnancy doesn’t happen.

I find it somewhat interesting religions frequently espouse it’s a sin to have an abortion. Sometimes I wonder if that’s for making the congregation bigger or for something else.

Why does a population have to increase faster than it decreases? Financial growth? Re-supply dead or wounded soldiers?


24 posted on 07/07/2018 7:17:32 AM PDT by Boomer (Leftism is the Mental/Moral Equivalent of End Stage Cancer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

If it gets overturned, then it gets overturned. I don’t really care.

If you want something to be a Constituionally protected right, then amend the Constitution.


25 posted on 07/07/2018 7:18:31 AM PDT by chris37 ("I am everybody." -Mark Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother
Really? You honestly believe that? Where do you draw the line? If a mother kills her infant hours after birth, is that just between her and God?

A case can be made that early-term abortion is more similar to withdrawal of life-support benefits from the mother. The fetus cannot survive without that life support.

Post-birth, there is no question about the baby needing life support which only the mother can provide, since a woman who does not want to raise the kid can put the kid up for adoption.

26 posted on 07/07/2018 7:20:22 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Go go Godzilla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boomer; All

She does not make any sense.

Conservatives are not all one way or the other. There are many pro-life groups.

Does she want all of them to stop their pro-life efforts because of her political analysis?

Roe v. Wade is a bad court decision. What happens is not up to “conservatives” as a group, but what happens when more originalist and textualists justices go to the Supreme Court.

It is stupid to play the Progressive game of making the Court a super-legislature.


27 posted on 07/07/2018 7:23:28 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

We need to not stop talking about these issues.

At the time Roe v. Wade was decided, the abortion rate quickly reached 1.6 million babies killed per year. Today, it is down to less that 900 thousand. Still too many, but we didn’t get here by shutting up and saying, “Well, it’s the law, so just ignore it.” We got here by continually pointing out the scientific facts of abortion—that it is not just another form of birth control, but a brutal snuffing out of a human life for utterly trivial “reasons.”

Just as abortion on demand was imposed on us by activist judges, so gay “marriage” was imposed through judicial fiat. When any “law” is imposed by a totalitarian judge, it is the deliberate crushing of the will of the people. Rule by elitist whim was exactly what we were trying to avoid with our three parts of government, yet we’ve had that for decades.

Keep up the fight. Giving it up just hastens our descent into dictatorship, which we are barely avoiding as it is.


28 posted on 07/07/2018 7:23:47 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

“Government has a role to play but regulating social issues is where it fails miserably”.

How is murdering babies a social issue? Please explain.


29 posted on 07/07/2018 7:24:06 AM PDT by Freedomlibertyjustice (Trust Trump/Sessions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Let’s just put a good orginalist (like Scalia’s former clerk Amy Barrett) on the court and let things take care of themselves.


30 posted on 07/07/2018 7:24:15 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Tomi Lahren: Pushing to Overturn Roe v. Wade Would Be a ‘Big Mistake’

This is a stupid argument. The supreme Court will not arbitrarily select ANY subject to rule on. It has to be brought before them.


31 posted on 07/07/2018 7:25:07 AM PDT by JayAr36 (Washinton DC, District of Corruption proven daily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
"Tomi Lahren: Pushing to Overturn Roe v. Wade Would Be a 'Big Mistake'"

That's not the issue anyway. It's a red herring. There's one candidate for nomination with a record of a decision involving abortion. He opposed government funding for an abortion involving an illegal immigrant. There's nothing about overturning Roe v. Wade in his history.

We don't need to be paying for that with big government funding. We don't need to be paying for unhealthy civilian social experiments that put our national defense at risk, either.


32 posted on 07/07/2018 7:28:04 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother

Yes. The media has so shifted the view to the left that nothing can change.


33 posted on 07/07/2018 7:28:54 AM PDT by GuavaCheesePuff (I want to thank the Good Lord for making me a Yankee-Old Yankee Stadium (1923-2008))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Try the 14th Amendment.


34 posted on 07/07/2018 7:29:07 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

The Court ruled 7–2, not by “five unelected goons in black robes”


35 posted on 07/07/2018 7:32:43 AM PDT by RedMonqey ("Those who turn their arms in for plowshares will be doing the plowing for those who didnÂ’t.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Roberts won’t take abortion cases, so this may be a lot to do about very little.

Many Americans are against abortion as contraception.

There will never be an outright ban, but it may be constricted.

It is a human life! And that’s why they can sell their body parts and buy a Lamborghini.


36 posted on 07/07/2018 7:35:51 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

The author states that she is proAbortion.

“We lose when we mess with social issues”

Exact whom does she mean by “We”?


37 posted on 07/07/2018 7:39:57 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (Committee to Re-Elect the President ( CREEP ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

I’d prefer the actual politicians not to mention it in their campaigns..Just let the overturn happen on its own, eventually once we get this judge and hopefully another one, somebody will bring a case to SCOTUS and it will be overturned. Likely not long from now. But lets not push it publicly, still need the wobbly suburban women to keep voting with us for now.


38 posted on 07/07/2018 7:40:42 AM PDT by Bruiser78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Four justices are needed for taking a case. It doesn’t depend on Roberts alone. Hasn’t Roberts been on the pro-life side up till now?


39 posted on 07/07/2018 7:48:01 AM PDT by Czech_Occidentalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Come to think of it, Kavanaugh did also decide against forcing employers and organizations through Obamacare to pay for abortion drugs for employees. He also argued in favor of pro-life speech.

But he hasn’t said anything in favor of overturning Roe v. Wade. As for government funding for abortions and efforts to violate the First Amendment by gagging pro-life groups, there’s nothing conservative about those efforts.


40 posted on 07/07/2018 7:49:37 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson