No it doesn't. Did you just make that up?
RIF keeps making outlandish and factually incorrect statements, then posting a conclusion.
I have seen straw man arguments before but never this badly and boldly done. They are akin to saying “When I plug my lamp in the wall it uses nanobots to ferry the light from the wall to the light bulb. Thus there are angels.”
Very few people are bold enough to be wrong over and over in such a baldfaced manner. I am almost impressed with the brazenness of it. Almost.
Thank God there are enough of us who understand science here so lurkers won’t think we are stupid, ignorant and/or nuts.
(courtesy ping to the subject of the discussion, per FR protocol)
Of course it predicts random distribution, because it claims the process is random.
Did you think evolution theory was accepted as a theory of design?