Posted on 07/05/2018 3:20:41 AM PDT by Enterprise
A Texas mother has been arrested for allegedly selling her young children.
Esmeralda Garza, 29, was arrested by Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) officials on Friday after she allegedly sold her 7-year-old boy to two men, KRIS-TV reported. Garza was also in the process of selling two other children a 2-year-old girl and a 3-year-old girl as well, officials said.
The arrest occurred after DPS officers executed a drug search warrant, according to KIII-TV.
Garza, of Corpus Christi, was charged with the sale or purchase of a child, which is a third-degree felony. She is being held on a $100,000 bond at the Nueces County Jail, KRIS reported.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
When I was working the S Texas border, we caught numerous groups of illegals that were totally kids, 6-10 years old, being herded North. All of these kids were being sold for child porn or indentured servitude. The first group we caught, we allowed to scatter in the brush. We spent almost 6 hours rounding them up. 43 in all, all under 12 years old. They were a terrible sight to see. After that if we had a group like this we made sure to have enough people so that they would not scatter.
I live in S Texas along the Coastal Bend.
Were they hers or did she just bring them over. Child trafficking?
Knew of some Garza’s there and understood they and the relatives were illegal. Once again, ICE is nowhere to be found.
They promised me they would not and so far so good. It helps when you've maintained a good relationship with them.
I was thinking that maybe she was just holding the kids and they weren’t really hers.
Mexicans have no value in life. My wife worked adult/child protection and found Mexicans selling their mentally retarded children as prostitutes more than once. It was common to find Mexican illegal aliens prostituting their children.
Mexico is sending us their garbage. Over 20% of their citizens now live in the US. That’s an INVASION!
We need to declare war on Mexico and correct this situation.
1.Not in your first post. You associated a tattoo with "satan's minion".
2.A tattoo is a "skin color". I only tried to have a l'il fun with it.
3. See #2
.
.
PS- I'm recuperating from knee surgery and pretty much have a week or 2 of being housebound. I can go on as long as you like or we can agree that you and I, along with some others on this forum, are different and can just move along. We most likely have common adversaries of a more vial nature that currently need our attention.
Have blessed day. d:^)
Who or what do you think the "two men" are that bought a little boy?
Your house, your rules. As it should be. d:^)
But when they get out on their own, it's their house, their rules. With still a consideration for their parents wishes... hopefully. Kids do like to rebel.
.
FWIW, I'm not a huge proponent of tattoos. I have a few, mostly from back when I was a rebellious kid. A lot of our vets have tattoos. A lot of great folks I've known over the years have had them.
All I'm saying is that the presence of tattoos does not equal the presence of evil. Just as the lack of tattoos does not equal the lack of evil.
Just sayin'. d:^)
Your blanket statement "...the use of false emotional arguments to try and make something that is not good, in general, OK." is very closed-minded, IMHO. The presence or absence of tattoos has nothing to do with the character of the person.
What about this one? If this tattoo troubles you, I pray that your daughters or wife or anyone you think is beautiful are never burn victims. (and yep, I'm a nurse, and have been in a burn unit....makeup to get this level of coverage is very time-consuming if it can be done at all.)
Wow, I’ve never seen anything like that. What a beautiful way to deal with mastectomies! They’d have to put me under general anaesthesia to do that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.