Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CALIFORNIA CHAOS: Plan To SPLIT STATE Into 3 GAINS STEAM Ahead Of Midterms
Hannity.com ^ | 07/02/18 | Hannity Staff

Posted on 07/02/2018 3:24:29 PM PDT by Enlightened1

The proposal to split California into three separate states is gaining traction just months ahead of the 2018 midterms, with many voters agreeing that the Golden State is simply too diverse and large to properly govern. The movement -dubbed by many as Cal3- calls for the division of California into three smaller states; each anchored by a major metropolitan center serving as the territory’s capital. While the direct plan has yet to be revealed, many are calling for the creation of California with Los Angeles as the state capital, Northern California with San Francisco as the capital, and Southern California with San Diego serving as the capital. “This is about people who want California to be fixed and saved and this is the way to do it,” the bids lead proponent told Fox News. “We have crumbling infrastructure, dirty water and failing schools. In almost every statistic, 49 states are doing better.” Read the full report at Fox News


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; democrats; fake; fakenews; midterms; split; state
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
I guess Leftist in California are attempting to have 6 U.S. Senators by splitting the State into 3 States vs the 2 they have now?
1 posted on 07/02/2018 3:24:29 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The constitution won’t allow it. They’re wasting their time.


2 posted on 07/02/2018 3:25:39 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I don’t care if they split the place into 3 as long as they take at least two of the chunks (and all the people in them) out of the USA as soon as possible.


3 posted on 07/02/2018 3:25:50 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Speaking as one who lives in the Seattle area, I don’t relish the thought of four more Senators from the west coast. The ones we have presently are the human equivalent of gangrene.


4 posted on 07/02/2018 3:28:02 PM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Kamila Harris and Dianne Feinstein x 3. Ugh! Crazy Ugly women apocalypse!


5 posted on 07/02/2018 3:28:03 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Split into TWO would produce two R senators and neutralize the two leftists.


6 posted on 07/02/2018 3:29:17 PM PDT by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What’s unconstitutional about it?
I’m not arguing, I just don’t know.


7 posted on 07/02/2018 3:29:35 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (Maxine Waters for House Minority Leader!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

This is the plan to support.

https://youtu.be/zTBG-GwBWsY


8 posted on 07/02/2018 3:30:25 PM PDT by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The commie left has so arranged it, that each of the three new “California’s” will still be controlled by them, i.e., by the big cities.


9 posted on 07/02/2018 3:32:08 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.


10 posted on 07/02/2018 3:32:30 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Three states as purposed is a horrible idea.


11 posted on 07/02/2018 3:32:46 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Hannity click bait.

“Gaining steam” in no way means it will garner a majority come November when the voters decide. Most people in California are political sheeple and wonder to what benefit is it to them.

Frankly I have diagnosed the county-by-county rearrangement amd see no great advantage to Conservatives. A possibility maybe in the new “Southern California, but with the cost of most likely two Lib U.S. Senators each for the new “California” and “Northern California”.


12 posted on 07/02/2018 3:33:09 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

This division looks calculated to give the Democrats four more senators.


13 posted on 07/02/2018 3:34:05 PM PDT by arthurus (tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

They are trying to spread the cancer instead of contain it. Each of their three proposed divisions contains a south western megacity bastion of socialism. That means six liberal senators from Californistan instead of two. Instead of being freed of their liberal overlords, this approaches liberal feudalism.


14 posted on 07/02/2018 3:34:27 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

.……….our Federal Legislature could not agree on whether it’s daylight or dark much less cutting up California into 3 lots.

So, even discussing this subject is laughable.


15 posted on 07/02/2018 3:35:25 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Negatory!


16 posted on 07/02/2018 3:36:07 PM PDT by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

they can split their ruined state into 33 pieces for all I care. Congress retains authority to admit or NOT admit new states... and it ain’t gonna happen...(note that putting such a measure on the ballot does NOTHING since it is the state’s Legislature... not voters... AND CONGRESS that decide. Putting the proposal on the ballot is a giant political CIRCUS....which, come to think of it, pretty well summarizes the once-golden state of Californication nowadays anyway, ha!)

Constitution of the USA:

“New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1


17 posted on 07/02/2018 3:36:40 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ( "Politicans aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I would guess that half of Calif. doesn’t want to be associated with any of those 3 cities.


18 posted on 07/02/2018 3:36:42 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
each anchored by a major metropolitan center

There is the problem: all Calif urban areas are liberal, so all three would end up keeping the states uber-leftist.

No change from what is now, so why bother? Jefferson is the only way that makes some sense.

19 posted on 07/02/2018 3:36:56 PM PDT by doorgunner69 (Give me the liberty to take care of my own security..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Congress signs off on this, its constitutional.


20 posted on 07/02/2018 3:38:02 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Democracy: The cliff's edge of Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson