Eeeh-yuck!
Really, though, she has all of six months experience as a judge (though she clerked for a couple of judges back in the ‘90s), and hasn’t worked in a law firm for 16 years.
Mostly she’s taught at Notre Dame while having a load of kids. Her husband is an assistant US attorney, I think it is, so he hasn’t been home as Mr. Mom.
Yeah, she clerked for Scalia and is a member of the Federalist Society, but we have no record to speak of on her judicial philosophy and conservatism in action.
If she weren’t female, nobody would be considering her as a nominee.
Absolutely wrong.
There have been other females under consideration, but this one rose right to the top of my list after the abuse she received from Diane Feinstein and Dick Durbin in the prior confirmation hearing for her current appellate court seat.
Anyone who can incite such hostility from those two @ssholes belongs on the U.S. Supreme Court for a minimum of 40 years.
Exactly my view. This isn't an election for home-coming queen. We are picking someone whose opinions will affect all of our lives for generations and need experienced judges with a sound record of well-reasoned constitutionally based jurisprudence.
The left hates her with a passion. Feinstein is seething with contempt for her and her faith which we’ll see again when she appears before the Senate Judiciary committee.
Scant judicial record but she’s a stealth candidate with a rock rib conservative public persona. A Pence acoylyte.
She’ll skate thru the hearings and would provide 3 decades of solid renderings.