Scott Lemieux is a lecturer in the Department of Political Science at the University of Washington. He is the co-author of Judicial Review and Democratic Theory and contributes regularly to The Week, Reuters, and the New Republic.
Scott Lemieux is a lecturer in the Department of Political Science at the University of Washington. He is the co-author of Judicial Review and Democratic Theory and contributes regularly to The Week, Reuters, and the New Republic.
Scotty pings my gaydar to 11.
L
Stupid fat slob. Nbc propagandist.
Fake news.
Scott Lemieux is an idiot.
I love it when liberal commie loons start wetting their pants, its a beautiful thing
They just cannot get over the fact that Hillary didn't win. What a bunch of sore losermen!
This has been a tough week for the liberals, hasn’t it? Supreme Court decisions going against them, and now the hated(by them) Trump gets another Supreme Court nominee.
And now that the Dems shot themselves in the foot on the Gorsuch nomination, by filibustering, then seeing the filibuster done away with, the Dems. can’t threaten a filibuster on this next nomination.
Their main hope, could be that with a margin of only 51-49, or 50-49 considering that John McCain may never return, some soft Republicans might vote against a strong conservative. That may be Chuck Schumer’s only hope.
the final blow fell on Wednesday afternoon
LOL don’t bet on it fat boy
“By handing a president not chosen by the people a second Supreme Court nomination, Anthony Kennedy’s ultimate legacy may be the destruction of the court as we know it.”
The danmed idiots NEVER quit——still moaning about the electoral college.
Poorest losers EVER !!!!!!!!!!!
.
This may be fun to watch, as this unfolds. Get popcorn.
I’m going to watch MSNBC tonight, to see how Rachel and her boys have their meltdown over this.
I don’t think Rachel will cry again. She only cries during ginned up events, such as Kids At The Border week.
“Donald Trump’s pro-business white nationalism”
LOL. These people are either crazy as hell or lying wildly through their teeth for propaganda purposes. Oh well, at least this guy isn’t pretending that the Dems aren’t aggressively anti-business and (therefore) anti-jobs.
“...a president not chosen by the people...”
Was watching the msnbc coverage of election night a few days ago. When it became apparent Trump was going to win, their analyst went to the map to talk about Hillary’s path to victory in the popular vote.
No kidding.
“a president not chosen by the people”
Cf Clinton in 1992 and Kennedy in 1960. The majority of “the people” voted against them in both cases. I’d suggest reading the US Constitution, but his ilk reject it.
Wow!
“Pro-business” has reached pejorative levels, like “racist” and “sexist”.
AMAZING!
I thought we “won” the cold war against communism...
This guys an idiot.
Kennedy will be remembered almost certainly for the same sex marriage ruling above all others... For good or ill.
Him whining that other rulings since then didn’t go the way he wanted is just crap on a cracker.
You numbskulls have got to learn that being pro-business is not a bad thing. Evidence: Look at the economy under Obama; possibly one of the most anti-business Presidents in the history of this Republic, yet welfare roles and minority employment increased. Do the 1-percenters get richer? Yes, but so do all of the others who now have jobs.
You clowns think the only way to become better off is to take it away from someone who has more. Why not try the Republican view that grows the economic pie? Even if your share of the pie doesn't increase, you still have more to eat! A rising tide lifts all boats and you idiots can't see that.
People with 15 inch necks should not be wearing shirts with 17 inch collars.
Now push back from the dinner table, Scott, and GFYS.
Let the insane rants begin. Why does this “male” care about women’s agenda? Oh, I know.
Trump is going to nominate, and the Senate is going to vote to accept, and democrats are going to be popping xanax.