What really baffles me is how the '4' that supported the unions justify their stance? Have they never read (or been read - in the case of the [so-called] "wise" latina) The Constitution???
” how the ‘4’ that supported the unions justify their stance?”
it’s not legal it’s political
What really baffles me is how the ‘4’ that supported the unions justify their stance?
**************
The Supreme Court is not really a court at all. It is nothing more than a political arbiter of legal disputes that reflect partisan ideological views. In other words, our Constitution and duly enacted laws often don’t matter. The Left uses the “court” to override the legislative process to get what they want.
>>What really baffles me is how the ‘4’ that supported the unions justify their stance? <<
Probably some sort of variation on the “free rider” argument. My guess.