Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xkaydet65
The implication is that people not in or legally in the US are not entitled to entry and the final judgement rests with the Chief Executive.

If the Court wanted to rule on something, they would state so explicit, not imply it. You are confounding two groups. The first are those not in the the US. The second are those that are in the US, legally or not.

102 posted on 06/27/2018 7:24:30 PM PDT by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: IndispensableDestiny

Obama already came down on this when he abandoned the one foot rule for Cubans and began rrturning all Cubans illegally entering US without due process. So you see it’s already been done.


103 posted on 06/27/2018 7:33:54 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson