Posted on 06/23/2018 7:00:25 AM PDT by Kaslin
I arrived in Seoul on the same day as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo after the Singapore Summit. In the wake of the meeting between President Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, Pompeo and I had essentially the same task: reassuring our allies.
Of course, he did it with high-level government officials, and I did it unofficially with many contacts who are journalists, business leaders and academics. But they all had at least one thing in common: concerns about President Trump’s announcement that we’d be stopping “war games” in the region.
Although he didn’t expressly say so, this is an apparent reference to the joint military exercises that we regularly conduct with South Korean military forces.
Some of these “war games” are quite large, such as the Ulchi Focus Guardian, which takes place in the fall and involves around 20,000 U.S. personnel, while others are field training exercises by a U.S. battalion or squadron.
Pyongyang, of course, hates these exercises, and has regularly called for them to be halted. North Korean officials often make this request a condition of stopping nuclear tests, as they did as recently as 2015.
In January of that year, they called on the U.S. to ease tensions on the peninsulaby “temporarily suspending joint military exercises in and around South Korea this year, and [in return] the DPRK [Democratic People’s Republic of Korea] is ready to temporarily suspend the nuclear test over which the U.S. is concerned.”
So we’ve been down this road before. We said no in 2015. We should say no now.
For one thing, the exercises are necessary if we’re to continue honoring our long-standing commitment to our South Korean allies. They “ensure that U.S. and South Korean forces, as well as select allied forces who are part of the United Nations Command, are able to work seamlessly together to defend South Korea from attack,” writes Thomas Spoehr, a former Pentagon official with more than 36 years of U.S. Army experience.
North Korean officials, in their usual blustery, bellicose fashion, refer to these exercises as “dress rehearsals” for an invasion. What they’re actually doing, however, is preventing an invasion – from Pyongyang. They know that if they get us to suspend our military exercises for an extended period of time that it will erode the readiness of U.S. and South Korean forces to successfully work together to defend South Korea.
But there’s another reason to reject any demands to suspend our “war games.” North Korea is “attempting to barter over something it does not legitimately possess,” in the words of Korea expert Bruce Klingner – namely, the ability to conduct nuclear tests.
Numerous U.N. Security Council resolutions bar North Korea from conducting any nuclear or ballistic missile tests. Yet Pyongyang has thumbed its nose at these resolutions time and again – and we’re expected to reward this behavior? Worse, to do so in a way that helps destabilize the region still more?
President Trump has also indicated that he’d like to bring U.S. troops home from the region at some point, which he says would save us a lot of money. Even setting aside a simple cost-benefit analysis (isn’t such an expense worth keeping the peace, especially considering the cost of war?), we wouldn’t be saving much.
Why? Because South Korea pays a large portion of the cost associated with keeping our troops there. And even if we move more than 28,000 troops back to Kansas or California or somewhere else in the U.S., we’d still have the expense of keeping them trained, fed and housed right here at home.
Besides, let’s consider what we’re funding here. As President John F. Kennedy once said, “The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it.”
We can furlough 28000 troops and not pay or feed them, or they could man another border somewhere...like Mexico.
I agree completely. If this were a different administration, I’d be worried. But I trust Trump, especially with the ‘Stache backing him up.
I think Trump found the magic elixir for North Korea that has eluded all of our moron presidents before. He realized you cannot talk someone into surrendering and ending their regime, while simultaneously insisting that you get to imprison or hang them.
You are correct. He did suspend them.
“Stopping “War Games” Prematurely: A Costly Mistake”
give me a F-ing break ... they can be restarted at any time should that be necessary ...
I don’t think it is a big deal to anybody except the people who want us to fight everywhere all the time. The exercises can be restarted at any time.
Not sure how Feulner makes his money these days but it wouldn't surprise me to learn he was commissioned by a foreign lobbyist to write this piece.
We can transition easily into the B1-B and ICBM war games.
How about we consider what George Washington said warning us against entangling alliances or John Quincy Adams telling us we should not go abroad looking for foes.
And the author of the piece graduated from college when JFK was president and I don't see any evidence that he ever volunteered for military service so he himself could share in paying the price for freedom.
Yep.
5.56mm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.