Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reno89519

Once again, as is almost always the case, it looks like they’ve ruled on something that is not a genuine federal issue.

If this is regarding state taxes within the state, that is not within the authority of the feds or the Supreme Court. If applicable, the ruling should only apply where one state is taxing goods from another state, which I believe would be unconstitutional.

So it would appear this ruling is unconstitutional because it is not a genuine constitutionally-recognized federal issue, or unconstitutional if it involves one state taxing goods coming from another state.


30 posted on 06/21/2018 8:27:27 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216
"that is not a genuine federal issue"

This strikes me as one of the few genuine "interstate commerce" situations.

53 posted on 06/21/2018 8:50:28 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Jim 0216

It seems to me that since States will be collecting taxes on out-of-state businesses, those same “foreign” companies should be able to require those same states to provide the services afforded all in-state brick-and-mortar businesses


58 posted on 06/21/2018 8:56:19 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson